The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
The Lannisters are of Andal descent, not First Men. Duh.
Do you think it's possible that Tyrion and/or Jamie/Cersei are children of the mad king?
No. We don't need multiple secret Targaryens.
How about the three-headed dragon? Possibly three dragon riders?
are there ANY far flung theories you've read about that you don't believe?
I've read the books in 2008 and seen the show. It's not so much reading about, as actually reading and seeing for myself. All theories I've believed so far have come true. It's a fantasy series all about such things, where GRRM drops hints all over the place in the books.
i don't have a problem with the book info being introduced, when it's relevant to the show but otherwise it just muddies the plot the show has laid out
It's the same story (just the books have more happening and more characters).
Besides, I think Jon is Azor Ahai, not Jamie. The stuff with Tyrion or Jamie being the third head of the dragon (with Jon and Dany, is very interesting).
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Fri August 11, 2017 4:19 pm
post-structuralist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
Anders wrote:
malice wrote:
i don't have a problem with the book info being introduced, when it's relevant to the show but otherwise it just muddies the plot the show has laid out
It's the same story (just the books have more happening and more characters).
They aren't the same thing. Just like the lotr movies were not the same. Everyone understands that except you for some reason. The books and the series are no longer interchangeable due to the constraints inherent in the medium of tv vs books
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Fri August 11, 2017 4:23 pm
post-structuralist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
cutuphalfdead wrote:
LOTR book and movie is much closer than ASOIAF/GoT
They beat the characters and dialogs all to hell in the movies, although the extended versions tried a little more to at least include Tolkien's dialog, even if it was attributed to the wrong characters
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
i don't have a problem with the book info being introduced, when it's relevant to the show but otherwise it just muddies the plot the show has laid out
It's the same story (just the books have more happening and more characters).
They aren't the same thing. Just like the lotr movies were not the same. Everyone understands that except you for some reason. The books and the series are no longer interchangeable due to the constraints inherent in the medium of tv vs books
I think LOTR basically was the same story. I've read the book (lotr) twice, and seen the movies several times.
Bigger changes here, but not to the main plot with Dany/Jon. At least not yet. Of course the series has gotten a lot further.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Fri August 11, 2017 4:34 pm
post-structuralist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
Anders wrote:
malice wrote:
Anders wrote:
malice wrote:
i don't have a problem with the book info being introduced, when it's relevant to the show but otherwise it just muddies the plot the show has laid out
It's the same story (just the books have more happening and more characters).
They aren't the same thing. Just like the lotr movies were not the same. Everyone understands that except you for some reason. The books and the series are no longer interchangeable due to the constraints inherent in the medium of tv vs books
I think LOTR basically was the same story. I've read the book (lotr) twice, and seen the movies several times.
Bigger changes here, but not to the main plot with Dany/Jon. At least not yet. Of course the series has gotten a lot further.
I dont care anymore. Youve bored me into submission.
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
i don't have a problem with the book info being introduced, when it's relevant to the show but otherwise it just muddies the plot the show has laid out
It's the same story (just the books have more happening and more characters).
They aren't the same thing. Just like the lotr movies were not the same. Everyone understands that except you for some reason. The books and the series are no longer interchangeable due to the constraints inherent in the medium of tv vs books
I think LOTR basically was the same story. I've read the book (lotr) twice, and seen the movies several times.
Bigger changes here, but not to the main plot with Dany/Jon. At least not yet. Of course the series has gotten a lot further.
I dont care anymore. Youve bored me into submission.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum