The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
He also got really fat for no reason than just being bored/lazy. Had to downgrade him some points for that.
How about Blake being constantly injured and breaking his hand on that equipment manager/secret gay lover guys face? Blake has already peaked and Kemp made a Finals. Would have won it too if it weren't for the Goat.
He also got really fat for no reason than just being bored/lazy. Had to downgrade him some points for that.
How about Blake being constantly injured and breaking his hand on that equipment manager/secret gay lover guys face? Blake has already peaked and Kemp made a Finals. Would have won it too if it weren't for the Goat.
True, true. I think Griffin is a more well rounded player, but you're probably right, Kemp's prime was a little better. Plus, dunkz.
Post subject: Re: A thread for Master Debaters: Who do you take in his Pri
Posted: Tue June 27, 2017 7:24 pm
Rank This Poster
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm Posts: 5223 Location: A Dark Place
Kemp. He had a good 10-year run where he probably averaged 18/10. Griffin can be spectacular, but has only had like 2 or 3 full seasons. Griffin wouldn't last 2 games in the NBA Kemp played in.
Post subject: Re: A thread for Master Debaters: Who do you take in his Pri
Posted: Wed June 28, 2017 12:53 pm
Rank This Poster
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm Posts: 5223 Location: A Dark Place
Hakeem vs. Shaq?
I don't think it's that close.
Hakeem's elite defense and athleticism clearly puts him on top, but I'm guessing the average NBA fan would think I'm nuts.
As I said in another thread, Hakeem had 2 of the best playoff runs in NBA history. I know those runs get glossed over because they were during Jordan's first retirement, but he was just unstoppable and exuded a kind of otherworldly grace and athleticism that was just beautiful.
Hakeem's elite defense and athleticism clearly puts him on top, but I'm guessing the average NBA fan would think I'm nuts.
As I said in another thread, Hakeem had 2 of the best playoff runs in NBA history. I know those runs get glossed over because they were during Jordan's first retirement, but he was just unstoppable and exuded a kind of otherworldly grace and athleticism that was just beautiful.
Post subject: Re: A thread for Master Debaters: Who do you take in his Pri
Posted: Wed June 28, 2017 3:25 pm
Rank This Poster
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm Posts: 5223 Location: A Dark Place
Even in today's NBA, I have a hard time seeing Stockton's assist records ever being touch. It's basically the equivalent of Rice's receiving stats.
Yet, he would struggle to get into my top 10 all-time PG list.
His actual value as a player was sooooo much less than his numbers. I realize that's got to do with his longevity and the kind of offense those Jazz teams ran, but still...
Even in today's NBA, I have a hard time seeing Stockton's assist records ever being touch. It's basically the equivalent of Rice's receiving stats.
Yet, he would struggle to get into my top 10 all-time PG list.
His actual value as a player was sooooo much less than his numbers. I realize that's got to do with his longevity and the kind of offense those Jazz teams ran, but still...
He wore short shorts though, so he's good in my book.
Post subject: Re: A thread for Master Debaters: Who do you take in his Pri
Posted: Wed June 28, 2017 3:56 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm Posts: 9188 Location: Franklin, MA
run2death wrote:
Hakeem vs. Shaq?
I don't think it's that close.
Hakeem's elite defense and athleticism clearly puts him on top, but I'm guessing the average NBA fan would think I'm nuts.
As I said in another thread, Hakeem had 2 of the best playoff runs in NBA history. I know those runs get glossed over because they were during Jordan's first retirement, but he was just unstoppable and exuded a kind of otherworldly grace and athleticism that was just beautiful.
That's a tough one, Shaq seems like the obvious choice, but Hakeem was sooooo good for those mid-90s Rockets teams, in addition to being damn good before that too. Probably go with Shaq just because he turned 3 different franchises into championship teams overnight, but man I really liked those Rockets teams.
Users browsing this forum: E.H. Ruddock and 65 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum