The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Tue February 07, 2017 9:46 pm
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm Posts: 13819 Location: An office full of assholes
durdencommatyler wrote:
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Tue February 07, 2017 9:56 pm
I Have A Third Nipple
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19720 Location: Cumberland, RI
durdencommatyler wrote:
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.
Why didn't he call a timeout when the Seahawks were inside the 5? No one will ever know for sure, he does these sorts of things all the time, but I imagine it had something to do with how the Pats were performing in short-yardage situations up until that point (i.e., not well).
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
you're smarter than this joey
I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris!
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Tue February 07, 2017 10:26 pm
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm Posts: 13819 Location: An office full of assholes
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
you're smarter than this joey
I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris!
you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
you're smarter than this joey
I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris!
you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.
Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.
But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Tue February 07, 2017 10:33 pm
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm Posts: 13819 Location: An office full of assholes
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
you're smarter than this joey
I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris!
you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.
Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.
But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
you're smarter than this joey
I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris!
you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.
Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.
But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Wed February 08, 2017 3:31 am
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm Posts: 4734 Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Silver lining; trying to take an opposite of sour grapes approach here. The Atlanta Falcons are my favorite team in all of sports, always have been. There has definitely more bad than good, more thin than thick. Even when they made the playoffs a disappointing let down of an ending was inevitable. My earliest athletic related memory is an infamous early 80s playoff loss against Dallas when Danny White led a late come from behind rally to win. But this Falcon team was different. For a little while on Sunday I truly felt my favorite team was about to be Super Bowl Champions, an experience I had never felt. Ever. While the feeling was fleeting it was real. While a gut punch followed I did get that experience and for that I am grateful. No parade or banner to raise but I did get a little taste of that excitement. I know it may not sound like much but there are several fan bases that haven't had even that.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Wed February 08, 2017 12:29 pm
Rank This Poster
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm Posts: 3676
Biff Pocoroba wrote:
Silver lining; trying to take an opposite of sour grapes approach here. The Atlanta Falcons are my favorite team in all of sports, always have been. There has definitely more bad than good, more thin than thick. Even when they made the playoffs a disappointing let down of an ending was inevitable. My earliest athletic related memory is an infamous early 80s playoff loss against Dallas when Danny White led a late come from behind rally to win. But this Falcon team was different. For a little while on Sunday I truly felt my favorite team was about to be Super Bowl Champions, an experience I had never felt. Ever. While the feeling was fleeting it was real. While a gut punch followed I did get that experience and for that I am grateful. No parade or banner to raise but I did get a little taste of that excitement. I know it may not sound like much but there are several fan bases that haven't had even that.
I can relate to all of that Biff. I don't remember Danny White, Billy White Shoes. Mine start the worse period after that with Gerald Riggs
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Wed February 08, 2017 5:10 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm Posts: 9185 Location: Franklin, MA
Simple Torture wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.
For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.
Why didn't he call a timeout when the Seahawks were inside the 5? No one will ever know for sure, he does these sorts of things all the time, but I imagine it had something to do with how the Pats were performing in short-yardage situations up until that point (i.e., not well).
He says he didnt call the timeout because he thought the Seahawks looked confused and felt it was better to let things play out than give them time to regroup.
Post subject: Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli
Posted: Sat February 11, 2017 2:43 am
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22302
that vest is genteel yet hype
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
