The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Did we need a thread for this? Isn't this what GD is?
in what way is this thread any less appropriate than any other thread?
I don't think it's an issue of appropriateness. It's more an issue of redundancy and clutter. And lack of originality and momentum. It's not a useful thread. It's not a parody thread -- or if it is, it's not a successful parody thread. It's just lame. But yeah, on that score, you're right. It's totally appropriate for GD, I suppose.
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 45317 Location: Garbage Dump
durdencommatyler wrote:
malice wrote:
B wrote:
Did we need a thread for this? Isn't this what GD is?
in what way is this thread any less appropriate than any other thread?
I don't think it's an issue of appropriateness. It's more an issue of redundancy and clutter. And lack of originality and momentum. It's not a useful thread. It's not a parody thread -- or if it is, it's not a successful parody thread. It's just lame. But yeah, on that score, you're right. It's totally appropriate for GD, I suppose.
Why don't you go back to being too busy for RM, jerk?
Did we need a thread for this? Isn't this what GD is?
in what way is this thread any less appropriate than any other thread?
I don't think it's an issue of appropriateness. It's more an issue of redundancy and clutter. And lack of originality and momentum. It's not a useful thread. It's not a parody thread -- or if it is, it's not a successful parody thread. It's just lame. But yeah, on that score, you're right. It's totally appropriate for GD, I suppose.
Why don't you go back to being too busy for RM, jerk?
Users browsing this forum: E.H. Ruddock and 27 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum