The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22269
philpritchard wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Canada is perfect just ask Rob Ford
He hasn't answered me yet.
sprinkle some crack on him
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Why don't they have answers now? They're scientists - how am I meant to have any trust in them?
I don't think the science knows.
So with so many US citizens having gotten Covid and the push to abolish the Affordable Care Act, thereby removing pre-existing conditions from insurance coverage (I know Trump says he's all about pre-existing conditions, but as everyone knows, what Trump says has zero relationship to what actually occurs or the truth), how does anyone in their right mind think now is the time to go this path?
Trump has no alternative plan (again, he says he does, but he says a lot of things really) except for some weird arse fetishized need for revenge on Obama for being a black president or something.
If the ACA goes pre-existing conditions go. And doesn't that mean almost 50% of the people the ACA was helping will suddenly once again be without coverage? Now also including anyone who contracted Covid as well.
I can't get past this one. Seems such a straightforward one to me, yet I see many people yelling loudly about the scourge of socialised healthcare. Crazy. Surely that's a better situation then no health care, which is what is currently on the table should the ACA go.
They want us to blame each other to confuse from the fact our leadership and experts failed. Stupid hash tag crap like "cult of selfishness" is case in point.
They want us to blame each other to confuse from the fact our leadership and experts failed. Stupid hash tag crap like "cult of selfishness" is case in point.
I blame exhaling. Think how much better the world would be if nobody exhaled. Exhaling contributes to both global climate change and the spreading of covid. If anything it's the cult of exhaling. Clinton didn't inhale, his real crime was exhaling.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Is there anything preventing the U.S. from making the pharmaceutical supply chain part of National Defense? Make that shit here instead of another tank?
Is there anything preventing the U.S. from making the pharmaceutical supply chain part of National Defense? Make that shit here instead of another tank?
They'd have to know what to make and have a patent for it.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22438 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
surfndestroy wrote:
bada wrote:
Is there anything preventing the U.S. from making the pharmaceutical supply chain part of National Defense? Make that shit here instead of another tank?
They'd have to know what to make and have a patent for it.
We'd also have to have a President and Senate who gave a fuck.
_________________ Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Why don't they have answers now? They're scientists - how am I meant to have any trust in them?
Because....COVID survivors who are 1, 3, 5, or 10 years past recovery don’t yet exist to be studied? I don’t understand your question.
Just calling back to what others had said about not trusting scientists cause they didn't have a complete handle on this virus right from the outset despite it being something completely new
_________________ "I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
Why don't they have answers now? They're scientists - how am I meant to have any trust in them?
Because....COVID survivors who are 1, 3, 5, or 10 years past recovery don’t yet exist to be studied? I don’t understand your question.
Just calling back to what others had said about not trusting scientists cause they didn't have a complete handle on this virus right from the outset despite it being something completely new
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
