The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Tue October 10, 2017 10:22 pm
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14201
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.
Plus it's California, so the moment you assume it's too absurd to be true...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum