Red Mosquito http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
Logan http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8645 |
Page 1 of 14 |
Author: | Peeps [ Wed October 05, 2016 10:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Logan |
Author: | VinylGuy [ Wed October 05, 2016 10:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
It would be nice to have at least one good movie of Wolverine. |
Author: | Jorge [ Wed October 05, 2016 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Giant Hand: The Movie |
Author: | Peeps [ Wed October 05, 2016 11:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
VinylGuy wrote: It would be nice to have at least one good movie of Wolverine. the first one was good (until the whole deadpool thing) i did like the wolverine (though i think it could have been better) this one sounds like they are going for the X-23 spin off |
Author: | Jorge [ Wed October 05, 2016 11:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Peeps wrote: the first one was good You may be the first person I've ever seen expressing this |
Author: | B [ Thu October 06, 2016 12:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Peeps' comic book movie assessments cannot be trusted. He's like the anti-LV. |
Author: | Rangi Guy [ Thu October 06, 2016 12:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Can we get to talking about how deformed the smaller hand is? |
Author: | Jorge [ Thu October 06, 2016 12:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
What's deformed about it? |
Author: | Rangi Guy [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
theplatypus wrote: What's deformed about it? There's no way with a hand that size, and where it's positioned that the fingers would be poking out the other side |
Author: | Jorge [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
You must have some wonky-ass hands down in New Zealand. Obviously, the smaller hand is just a regular-sized adult hand, and the Wolverine hand is just gigantized for this poster. |
Author: | Rangi Guy [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
I get that the smaller hand is an adult hand, but if both those hands were to scale - the smaller hand is stupidly long |
Author: | Jorge [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Maybe a little bit. I dunno. It looks normal to me. |
Author: | VinylGuy [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
its not that important guys. Its just a teaser poster. Nobody will care in a month or so. Maybe sooner. Tomorrow. |
Author: | doone [ Thu October 06, 2016 1:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
VinylGuy wrote: Its just a teaser poster. Well, I'm teased! |
Author: | Rangi Guy [ Thu October 06, 2016 2:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Well obviously he's not healing like he used to looking at that hand. |
Author: | Jorge [ Thu October 06, 2016 2:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
The small hand? |
Author: | Rangi Guy [ Thu October 06, 2016 2:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Not the weirdly deformed hand - Logan's cut hand |
Author: | Leatherhead [ Thu October 06, 2016 2:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Peeps wrote: VinylGuy wrote: It would be nice to have at least one good movie of Wolverine. the first one was good (until the whole deadpool thing) i did like the wolverine (though i think it could have been better) this one sounds like they are going for the X-23 spin off Never saw the first one, just heard too many bad things. Thought the second one was pretty good, although the final act was a bit of a letdown. |
Author: | LoathedVermin72 [ Thu October 06, 2016 4:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Not very excited by Mangold directing again. |
Author: | jwfocker [ Thu October 06, 2016 11:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Logan |
Love the character and I think Hugh Jackman does a wonderful job as Wolverine but man these movies have been bad. |
Page 1 of 14 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |