The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 35  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Episode 3 takes a giant leap forward. I enjoyed 1 & 2. They didn't totally blow me away. There were more than a few clunky moments. But #3 was really great. Tense. Gorgeous. Wonderfully shot. Dripping with atmosphere. I dig it. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:


It's too early for you to be drinking all this vodka, Joey.

:lol:

You didn't like the series?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46378
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Episode 3 takes a giant leap forward. I enjoyed 1 & 2. They didn't totally blow me away. There were more than a few clunky moments. But #3 was really great. Tense. Gorgeous. Wonderfully shot. Dripping with atmosphere. I dig it. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:


It's too early for you to be drinking all this vodka, Joey.

:lol:

You didn't like the series?


My feelings are very mixed. We're only five eps in...

I think the cinematography, music, and casting (with the exceptions of Ryder and Caleb McLaughlin/"Lucas") are excellent. I don't agree with LV's "faux retro" comment, though I get what he's saying. But I think it's a very effective soundtrack.
I enjoy the 80s throwback vibe of the whole production.
I think the kids have real chemistry...

I think the dialogue is atrocious. At one point, Lucas says "I second that." There are many moments like this, where the kids' natural chemistry is shattered by having them speak far more intelligently than any 12-year old I've ever known. I think everything with 11 is especially terrible. "Bad." "Good." "Promise." Vomit.

I agree with whoever posted that the story is held back by trying to appeal to kids. There are a lot of parts that are neither genuinely scary, nor terribly funny. It's like they're going for a Fratellis (from The Goonies) approach, but it's constantly missing the mark. War of the Worlds is another recent example of something that managed to ride that fine line between frightening and family-friendly. This is so far off from that.

I think Winona Ryder is AWFUL. Matthew Modine isn't much better, though I think that's more related to the writing for his character. Ryder's eldest son is also really over-the-top.

I hope season 2 focuses on Nancy's obvious eating disorder.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
Okay, yeah, we're fairly close on our opinions here. I disagree with a few points you've made but mostly we feel about the same.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Episode 3 takes a giant leap forward. I enjoyed 1 & 2. They didn't totally blow me away. There were more than a few clunky moments. But #3 was really great. Tense. Gorgeous. Wonderfully shot. Dripping with atmosphere. I dig it. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:


It's too early for you to be drinking all this vodka, Joey.

lol

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46378
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
durdencommatyler wrote:
Okay, yeah, we're fairly close on our opinions here. I disagree with a few points you've made but mostly we feel about the same.


It's a slow day on RM. Can you itemize your disagreements for me?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Okay, yeah, we're fairly close on our opinions here. I disagree with a few points you've made but mostly we feel about the same.


It's a slow day on RM. Can you itemize your disagreements for me?

:lol:

Sure!

Gimme a sec...


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46378
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
I do want to give a nod to the cocky boyfriend. He's every 80s cocky boyfriend character rolled into one, perfectly executed.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
Agree
tragabigzanda wrote:
-I think the cinematography, music, and casting (with the exceptions of Ryder and Caleb McLaughlin/"Lucas") are excellent [I'd add Modine].
-I don't agree with LV's "faux retro" comment, though I get what he's saying. But I think it's a very effective soundtrack.
-I enjoy the 80s throwback vibe of the whole production.
-I think the kids have real chemistry...
-I think the dialogue is atrocious. [I agree in general, but there are some decent moments, I think]
-I think Winona Ryder is AWFUL. Matthew Modine isn't much better, though I think that's more related to the writing for his character. Ryder's eldest son is also really over-the-top.
Disagree
tragabigzanda wrote:
-There are many moments like this, where the kids' natural chemistry is shattered by having them speak far more intelligently than any 12-year old I've ever known.
-I think everything with 11 is especially terrible. "Bad." "Good." "Promise." Vomit. [She's outstanding and probably my single favorite part of the show so far.]
-I agree with whoever posted that the story is held back by trying to appeal to kids. There are a lot of parts that are neither genuinely scary, nor terribly funny. It's like they're going for a Fratellis (from The Goonies) approach, but it's constantly missing the mark. [I think this comes down to expectations, though. I think people want it to be scarier or whatever but I'm not sure that was ever the point.]
-War of the Worlds is another recent example of something that managed to ride that fine line between frightening and family-friendly. This is so far off from that. [War of the Worlds is terrible]

tragabigzanda wrote:
I hope season 2 focuses on Nancy's obvious eating disorder.

:haha: :haha: :haha:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
tragabigzanda wrote:
I do want to give a nod to the cocky boyfriend. He's every 80s cocky boyfriend character rolled into one, perfectly executed.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46378
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
It's a good point you make about expectations -- I probably do want it to be scarier than they intended. But if not scary, then is it more family-friendly they're going for? (Of course it doesn't have to be such a clear dichotomy). But anyway, a lot of bits fall flat, because there is neither something scary or funny for me to latch on to. Case in point, the scene with the monster at the pool: His design and delivery was neither scary enough to give me the creeps, nor funny enough for me to laugh at. Just sort of there, like they said, "...and then a MONSTER comes out!" "Ok, but what kind of monster?" "Eh, just your general scary sort of monster."

To clarify, I think the girl they cast as 11 is doing a great job with what she's given. Like all the other kids (save Lucas), she's got a great face for television, and she displays a lot of emotion with very little dialogue. I just wish her lines weren't so hammy.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
jeeeesus relax already
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Posts: 35398
Yeah, she was good.

I loved the ride...it was nice...Its a flawed production for sure, but there are enough good elements to enjoy it.

_________________
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
what on earth am I talking about
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 35364
If you don't lim this show you're dead inside


*speaking as a child of the 80s


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Mind Your Tanners
 Profile

Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 8540
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
I lim it with all my heart - I thought it was great!

_________________
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39537
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
I lim it.

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
dimejinky99 wrote:
If you don't lim this show you're dead inside


*speaking as a child of the 80s

The scene in episode 3 where the kids are hunting for the perfect rock for the slingshot. Christ! That scene was fantastic. Damn near made me cry. I love these kids working together. :heartbeat:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39537
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Thank God we eighties children FINALLY have someone making nostalgic shows for US.

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78180
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
:lol:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Sun July 31, 2016 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46378
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
If you don't lim this show you're dead inside


*speaking as a child of the 80s

The scene in episode 3 where the kids are hunting for the perfect rock for the slingshot. Christ! That scene was fantastic. Damn near made me cry. I love these kids working together. :heartbeat:


One of my favorite parts, too. Great example of the show's strengths.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Mon August 01, 2016 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Posts: 27937
dimejinky99 wrote:
Knew my boyfriend would love this but when I get excited about something he's usually really reluctant.

He watched episode one with me last night and was totally in by the end of it:) watched two more :)

haha, you're definitely the overselling type. my good friend is the same way.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: TV: Stranger Things
PostPosted: Mon August 01, 2016 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar
what on earth am I talking about
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 35364
If its of any consequence I enjoyed it way way more the second go round. Picked up on a lot more of the hidden and not so hidden references to everything 80s


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 35  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ello Sailor and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Thu March 28, 2024 6:58 pm