Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7287		 Page 9 of 16
Author:  tragabigzanda [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.
Author:  Strat [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

There you go. That's totally possible. It's a pretty shallow film that doesn't really require your repeated attention. You kinda get it the first time.
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

There you go. That's totally possible. It's a pretty shallow film that doesn't really require your repeated attention. You kinda get it the first time.

yet they are currently filming 4 more of them.
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."


i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar :bammer:

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

There you go. That's totally possible. It's a pretty shallow film that doesn't really require your repeated attention. You kinda get it the first time.

yet they are currently filming 4 more of them.

Don't get me started.
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."


i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."


i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

What if I just sit really really really close to my TV
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."


i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

What if I just sit really really really close to my TV

That should be fine
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."


i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

What if I just sit really really really close to my TV

No deal.
Author:  Strat [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
what TV do you have LV?
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

Image
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

Image
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

Image

:lol:
Author:  Strat [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
:D
Author:  epilogue [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500

Curved?
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500

Curved?

Yup
Author:  Strat [ Wed October 25, 2017 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Strat wrote:
what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500

I want this. When I finally buy my own home I'm going to get it. ive spent enough on my stereo setup and now its time for the Visual.
Page 9 of 16 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/