The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 58  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 10:46 pm 
Offline
A Return To Form
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Posts: 248
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
We're up to Ep 14 of the second season. I don't think Mrs Wease is gonna stick with it. I'm getting to where I'm ready for it to end. It's not that it's bad, it's just going so slow. I'm used to the oddball story quirks by now, I just want it to speed up.

Duchovney has been fun, tho. Is he in the new season?

You're in the worst part of it now. It starts to pick up a tad more steam around episode 21. And then 25/6 through the end is really strong to great.

25/6??? Netflix only has up to 22 episodes. Do they not have all the episodes up?

I thought you were talking about overall episode number. Not S2 episode number. If you're at ep 14 OF S2, then the worst is behind you.

God, that makes me happy.

:luv:

You're so close. Just get to those last three/four episodes. The show ends SO strongly. It's worth it.


This.

Other than the semi-pointless James plot line, the lower quality episodes are setting the foundation for the last 2 or 3 episodes, which are just fantastic.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 10:48 pm 
Offline
A Return To Form
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Posts: 248
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:
I could discuss the Bowie scenes all day.

Just out curiosity, did the sound seem louder than for a normal movie? I've read (and it could have been on here, so I hope I'm not repeating things) that during the original theatrical run, Lynch specifically asked that the movie be turned up 2 db louder than normal.

The overall volume was extremely loud for the movie. The dialogue was normal, though. So my wife had a really difficult time with many of the scenes because she couldn't hear what people were saying. The best example of what I'm talking about was this scene:

Image


The sound of the Leland's engine revving and all the cars honking and Laura screaming completely drowned out what Mike was saying. I had to fill my wife in on the exchange a bit. It's way easier to understand him on the DVD that I have.

But, yes, in general, the film was exceptionally loud. Except dialogue.


That's really interesting. Even watching it for the first time 4 months ago at home, I had a hard time understanding the dialogue in that scene. The noise is extremely jarring, but I think it's effective because it drives the terror of the scene and the feeling of being caught completely off guard.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2017 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32515
Location: Where everybody knows your name
Doesn't look like I'll be getting to watch this any time soon. My hope was that my in-laws had Showtime and I could use their account to watch it OnDemand like I do HBO. They aren't subscribers to Showtime.

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
"There are many stories in Twin Peaks — some of them are sad, some funny. Some of them are stories of madness, of violence. Some are ordinary. Yet they all have about them a sense of mystery — the mystery of life. Sometimes, the mystery of death. The mystery of the woods. The woods surrounding Twin Peaks. To introduce this story, let me just say it encompasses the All — it is beyond the "Fire", though few would know that meaning. It is a story of many, but begins with one — and I knew her. The one leading to the many is Laura Palmer. Laura is the one."

That gum we like is officially back in style.

HAPPY RETURN OF TWIN PEAKS DAY EVERYONE!!!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
jeeeesus relax already
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Posts: 36300
wow 25 years.

_________________
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
IT WAS FORETOLD!

Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
Just to help you "Prime the Pump" (as president 45 would say):



Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 4:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
:shock:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 4:34 am 
Offline
User avatar
10Club Complaint Department
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Posts: 15163
It's afternoon here now and I won't get a chance to watch it til later tonight, I'll take that as a positive (if bewildered) recommendation.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:05 am 
Offline
A Return To Form
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Posts: 248
I watched 2 out of the 4. I loved it. So far it's definitely closer to Fire Walk With Me than the original series. It's so weird, but in a good way.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
I Have A Third Nipple
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Posts: 19724
Location: Cumberland, RI
They released 4 at once? They're not doing that every week, are they? I think I'm going to get caught up on Fargo before diving in.

_________________
McParadigm wrote:
lol


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
 Profile

Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 9:30 pm
Posts: 823
These 18 parts are setting up to be wildly fun.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
10Club Complaint Department
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Posts: 15163
Only had time to watch the first episode so far but woah.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32515
Location: Where everybody knows your name
How was it Joey?

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
wease wrote:
How was it Joey?

I mean....


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
The Showtime online/app dropped four episodes at once. Apparently 1 & 2 aired last night. Episodes 3 & 4 air this coming Sunday. I don't think they're putting anything new up until the week after when episode 5 drops.

Point being, I'm holding off on watching 3 & 4 until later in the week. I want to savor this. I watched 1 & 2 last night and I'm floored. I want to watch 1 & 2 again before watching the next parts. There is so much to track and unpack.

This is going to be difficult to talk about as people continue to get caught up.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
parasolmonster wrote:
I watched 2 out of the 4. I loved it. So far it's definitely closer to Fire Walk With Me than the original series. It's so weird, but in a good way.

I would agree it's closer to FWWM... but it's not at all like FWWM. It almost has it's own unique tone that is somewhere between the series and the film. But he has already terrified me to my marrow; something Lynch does at least once a movie/show. Just bone chilling oddity and terror. But he's also made me laugh out loud like a goddam idiot.

Yeah. Yeah, this is gonna be fun. I can't believe this is finally here. I'm an emotional wreck. My insides are all over the place.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
This review (of the first 2 episodes) from the New York Times absolutely NAILS it:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/21/arts ... eview.html


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:03 pm 
Offline
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Posts: 3879
Having only seen the first two, it feels like it struck the perfect balance between respecting the tone of the original while not willing to give an ounce to unearned nostalgia. I think the fact that the premiere was so willing to hold back on straight up fan service in terms of parading returning character one after the other is a good sign.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78452
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
digster wrote:
Having only seen the first two, it feels like it struck the perfect balance between respecting the tone of the original while not willing to give an ounce to unearned nostalgia. I think the fact that the premiere was so willing to hold back on straight up fan service in terms of parading returning character one after the other is a good sign.

Well fucking said.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 58  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sat April 27, 2024 9:47 am