Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6692		 Page 5 of 17
Author:  stip [ Sun July 23, 2017 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!

Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
Author:  wease [ Sun July 23, 2017 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
stip wrote:
that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!

Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible

The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.

Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)
Author:  Peeps [ Sun July 23, 2017 3:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
theplatypus wrote:
There are a lot of shots thast I like (the ones that look like 17th century paintings) but they will inevitably be part of some flashback / retelling of past events / quick montage and not the actual plot


youd be wrong. for most of the story on sakaar appear to be heavily influenced by kirbys art work and are neither flashback, retelling, quick montage and while not a plot device it aids the plot
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Sun July 23, 2017 4:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Well that looks interesting. It's a bit similar to guardians though no?
Author:  wease [ Sun July 23, 2017 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
dimejinky99 wrote:
Well that looks interesting. It's a bit similar to guardians though no?

No
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Sun July 23, 2017 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?
Author:  Jorge [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Peeps wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
There are a lot of shots thast I like (the ones that look like 17th century paintings) but they will inevitably be part of some flashback / retelling of past events / quick montage and not the actual plot


youd be wrong. for most of the story on sakaar appear to be heavily influenced by kirbys art work and are neither flashback, retelling, quick montage and while not a plot device it aids the plot

I don't think we're talking about the same thing
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?



I guess the comedy element. Neither Banner nor Thor strike me as funny guys.

Plus the interior sets look similar
Author:  doone [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
dimejinky99 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?



I guess the comedy element. Neither Banner nor Thor strike me as funny guys.

Plus the interior sets look similar


Thor is usually portrayed as a bit of a dim bulb, not quite as literal as Drax but close; that makes for good comedy.
Author:  stip [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
plus hemsworth is an excellent comedic actor
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I'm not averse to it just surprised by it.
Author:  Jorge [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Thor has been played for comedy in every appearance he's made. He is super self-serious and not especially bright which makes for good fodder.
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Sun July 23, 2017 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I don't remember any of the films he's been in really tbh. The marvel movies all sorta blend into each other really.
Author:  VinylGuy [ Sun July 23, 2017 7:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Looks cheap.
Author:  BurtReynolds [ Sun July 23, 2017 7:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Looks really expensive actually
Author:  bada [ Sun July 23, 2017 9:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
wease wrote:
stip wrote:
that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!

Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible

The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.

Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)



Clancy Brown rules.
Author:  wease [ Sun July 23, 2017 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
bada wrote:
wease wrote:
stip wrote:
that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!

Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible

The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.

Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)



Clancy Brown rules.

Fuck yeah, he does. He'll never beat his role in Shawshank for me.
Author:  VinylGuy [ Sun July 23, 2017 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
BurtReynolds wrote:
Looks really expensive actually


Yeah lots of effects but everything is so digital. Even when they are in actual sets, it looks really cheap and weird.
Author:  Jorge [ Sun July 23, 2017 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
The CGI looks incomplete but that's become common for these event trailers
Author:  VinylGuy [ Sun July 23, 2017 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Hulk talking looks awful.

The photography on Ruffalo and Thor looks weirdly cheap.
Page 5 of 17 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/