Switch to full style
Books, movies, television...
Post a reply

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 07, 2017 2:02 pm

Rangi Guy wrote:Was the orgy joke really any worse than.....

Thor: I spun the hammer really fast and it would pull me off -
Korg: Oh my God! The hammer pulled you off?

I think that one may have flew by a few people. I was cracking up at it but no one else was.

I mean, I'm laughing right now thinking of the delivery of that line. so good.
wease wrote:The rock-paper-scissors bits were really good.

Also, remember the leaked Avengers 3 footage from SDCC that had the Guardians finding Thor? I just looked again and
Spoiler: show
Thor has two eyes.

On a podcast they mentioned this and said it was probably to keep it from being spoiled in Thor. I mean, if the San Diego people would have reported Thor only having one eye, it would have kind of given away part of this movie, yeah?
BurtReynolds wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:
wease wrote:The rock-paper-scissors bits were really good.

Also, remember the leaked Avengers 3 footage from SDCC that had the Guardians finding Thor? I just looked again and
Spoiler: show
Thor has two eyes.

The trailer for Thor also
Spoiler: show
didn't show any damage to his eye when he landed on the rainbow bridge thingie and had lightning sparking out of every orifice

yeah I noticed that one.

Spoiler: show
The missing eye effect looked weird .

There were a couple spots where you could still see his eye and I kept thinking, "They spent millions on this movie and someone missed the fact you can see his eye through the makeup?"

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sat November 11, 2017 6:28 pm

I enjoyed this for the most part but definitely felt like way too many things going on and not enough time spent with any of them.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sat November 11, 2017 8:09 pm

I haven't seen it yet so I skipped the last couple of pages of discussion but I have a question...

Does this benefit from 3D or can I get away with regular D?

(3D makes me dizzy sometimes).

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sat November 11, 2017 8:17 pm

Skip the 3D

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sat November 11, 2017 8:24 pm

this was a mess, but goldblum was fun

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sun November 12, 2017 1:22 am

Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sun November 12, 2017 1:33 am

theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D

Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sun November 12, 2017 1:39 am

i got bugs wrote:
Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??


Spoiler: show
Thanos.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Sun November 12, 2017 3:17 am

Stickman wrote:
i got bugs wrote:
Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??


Spoiler: show
Thanos.


Spoiler: show
oh wait.. the leaked trailer.. you're right, it's sanctuary

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Mon November 13, 2017 12:43 am

I thoroughly enjoyed this and can't remember a time when I laughed this much at a comic book movie or action movie in general. Mark Ruffalo's scenes were ace.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Mon November 13, 2017 1:08 am

doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D

Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?


I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Mon November 13, 2017 5:25 am

MitchCumstein wrote:
doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D

Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?


I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.

3D is never necessary.

except maybe a couple of scenes in Jackass 3D

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Mon November 13, 2017 11:29 am

saw this a second time with the wife.

I think I liked it equally the first and second time. The first time everything was unexpected. The second time I could appreciate it without prior expectations. Very solid movie but didn't crack my top 3 (or possibly even top 5) like I had hoped. My wife loved it but wished it was a bit more serious with Hela (tonally she likes where the Captain America movies are best, or anything with Robert Downey Junior)

With minimal prior knowledge of the movies she thought Justice League looked too dreary and is super excited for Black Panther.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 4:10 am

You know, funny you should say that about Black Panther. I was minimally interested based on the trailers, but that one was one that actually really benefited from the big screen. More immersive than maybe i was able to get off a laptop screen.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 6:23 am

No interest in Black Panther. The trailers look like crap

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 11:16 am

Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:
doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D

Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?


I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.

3D is never necessary.

except maybe a couple of scenes in Jackass 3D


Piranha.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 1:47 pm

is there 3D pron?

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 2:23 pm

E.H. Ruddock wrote:is there 3D pron?

Yeah, it's called real life.

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Tue November 14, 2017 2:27 pm

doone wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:is there 3D pron?

Yeah, it's called real life.

thanks for explaining the joke, chud

Spoiler: show
;)

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Thu December 07, 2017 3:17 pm

Ok i was surprised on how much i enjoyed it. It was fun.
Post a reply