The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Posts: 3721
durdencommatyler wrote:
Maybe they're just introducing and setting up the Planet Hulk story (for a later film) in a Thor movie more than watering it down and cramming it into a Thor movie.



unless they do it like spider-man homecoming i dont see it

meaning they show a flashback to how he got to skaar and then his fight with thor real quick as a recap (as they show spider-man at the airport and some knew views of the airport fight) but then show everything else up to and after thor

_________________
Chris_H_2 wrote:
...i really think i pissed myself.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
Well, you'd know better than me. I actually don't know anything about the Planet Hulk story at all. I was just trying to make B feel better. Is Thor v Hulk a Planet Hulk thing? Is Jeff Goldblum in/on Planet Hulk?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Posts: 3721
what the fuck kind of foolishness is this, trying to make b feel better

_________________
Chris_H_2 wrote:
...i really think i pissed myself.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 3075
Location: Washington State
What he means is that Marvel can't make a Hulk movie so they'd have to partner with Universal much like they did with Sony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cro ... 67512.html

_________________
"If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.”


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
Peeps wrote:
what the fuck kind of foolishness is this, trying to make b feel better

:lol:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
bune wrote:
What he means is that Marvel can't make a Hulk movie so they'd have to partner with Universal much like they did with Sony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cro ... 67512.html

How weird.

I didn't read that entire article, so maybe it addresses this (sorry if it does; just call me an asshole and tell me to read the whole thing) but wasn't Norton's Hulk movie a Marvel film? Have the rights lapsed or something since there hasn't been a stand alone Hulk film since?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 6:38 pm 
Online
User avatar
"You kids quit having fun with the word filter!"
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 27211
Location: don't PM me I don't have anything
It was produced by Marvel Studios and is officially in the MCU canon, but that was before Marvel was acquired by Disney. It was distributed by Universal

_________________
tragabigzanda wrote:
Stop it, this is pissing me off.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
theplatypus wrote:
It was produced by Marvel Studios and is officially in the MCU canon, but that was before Marvel was acquired by Disney. It was distributed by Universal

Ah. Thank you.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unqualified to be an Admin
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 7776
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
durdencommatyler wrote:
bune wrote:
What he means is that Marvel can't make a Hulk movie so they'd have to partner with Universal much like they did with Sony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cro ... 67512.html

How weird.

I didn't read that entire article, so maybe it addresses this (sorry if it does; just call me an asshole and tell me to read the whole thing) but wasn't Norton's Hulk movie a Marvel film? Have the rights lapsed or something since there hasn't been a stand alone Hulk film since?


Yeah, this is a big piece of it. For "legal reasons" Marvel can't make a stand-alone Hulk movie (aka Planet Hulk), or at least, they can't do it w/o sharing money with Universal, but they can put Hulk in other Marvel movies.

_________________
"In a roundabout way, Boba Fett created Pearl Jam." - Chuck Klosterman


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
B wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
bune wrote:
What he means is that Marvel can't make a Hulk movie so they'd have to partner with Universal much like they did with Sony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cro ... 67512.html

How weird.

I didn't read that entire article, so maybe it addresses this (sorry if it does; just call me an asshole and tell me to read the whole thing) but wasn't Norton's Hulk movie a Marvel film? Have the rights lapsed or something since there hasn't been a stand alone Hulk film since?


Yeah, this is a big piece of it. For "legal reasons" Marvel can't make a stand-alone Hulk movie (aka Planet Hulk), or at least, they can't do it w/o sharing money with Universal, but they can put Hulk in other Marvel movies.

This shit is way too complicated.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 3075
Location: Washington State
durdencommatyler wrote:
bune wrote:
What he means is that Marvel can't make a Hulk movie so they'd have to partner with Universal much like they did with Sony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-cro ... 67512.html

How weird.

I didn't read that entire article, so maybe it addresses this (sorry if it does; just call me an asshole and tell me to read the whole thing) but wasn't Norton's Hulk movie a Marvel film? Have the rights lapsed or something since there hasn't been a stand alone Hulk film since?

:shake: :lol:

Also: Marvel keeps making big announcements about wanting to get all their properties back but so far they've gotten...Daredevil, Ghost Rider, maybe Namor but who really cares about fish-face? I mean without Reed Richards, who is he going to be a dick to? And the way Marvel's going with their slap-happy friendly movies, who wants a movie about him anyway? The fan boys will be pissed because he's not a big enough dick and that's all who would really care. I mean come on, it's Namor ffs.

To be honest the only thing I've really seen him in story-wise was the one Phoenix thing when he and Cyclops and some others all got part of the Phoenix Force and that was dumb as rocks.

_________________
"If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.”


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 55153
Location: The applebees on haggerty.
I have no idea what that means.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unqualified to be an Admin
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 7776
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
bune wrote:
Also: Marvel keeps making big announcements about wanting to get all their properties back but so far they've gotten...Daredevil, Ghost Rider, maybe Namor but who really cares about fish-face?


To be fair, no one gave a shit about Ironman and Thor prior to 2008.

_________________
"In a roundabout way, Boba Fett created Pearl Jam." - Chuck Klosterman


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 3075
Location: Washington State
True, I just don't see how he could be brought in line with the way things are right now. Though once they lose everyone - The Chris', RDJ, etc - the recasting could open something up.

Oh and I was wrong - they have Namor now. Maybe. It's a possibility.
Quote:
In 2012, Marvel CCO Joe Quesada thought Namor's film rights had reverted to Marvel, but in August 2013 it was revealed by Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige that this was not the case, and the rights remained at Universal Pictures.[105] Borys Kit of The Hollywood Reporter stated in May 2014 that Marvel now has the rights for Namor.[106][107] On June 3, 2014, Kit confirmed that Marvel, not Universal now has the Namor film rights.[106] On July 18, 2014, Feige told IGN in an interview that the Namor film rights are not with Universal or Legendary Pictures, but he explained there are a number of contracts and deals that need to be sorted out.[108] In June 2016, on the podcast Fat Man on Batman, Quesada again stated that, to his knowledge, Marvel owned the film rights to Namor.[109]
Man, and you thought what I posted before was confusing.

_________________
"If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.”


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 2:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
The worst
 Profile

Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Posts: 29385
First full trailer is out. Oh my god!

_________________
*Led Zeppelin Mega Tournament: Click here*


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 3:03 am 
Offline
User avatar
Worst Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 44628

Looks pretty bonkers for a marvel movie

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 3:23 am 
Offline
User avatar
Mind Your Tanners
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 8879
Location: Alive in the Superunknown
Hulk talks!!!!!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 3:45 am 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Posts: 3351
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Rayden Wins!

_________________
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 28887
Location: Anywhere mediocrity is celebrated.
That was a pretty awesome trailer.

_________________
dev wrote:
Love pans out.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
PostPosted: Sun July 23, 2017 5:40 am 
Online
User avatar
"You kids quit having fun with the word filter!"
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 27211
Location: don't PM me I don't have anything
There are a lot of shots thast I like (the ones that look like 17th century paintings) but they will inevitably be part of some flashback / retelling of past events / quick montage and not the actual plot

_________________
tragabigzanda wrote:
Stop it, this is pissing me off.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 12  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Thu November 23, 2017 12:10 am