The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 10:41 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Insufferably bad, dumb, shit writing
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
If you think the first five episodes of the season left us in an off place, that is probably the fault of previous seasons, since this is where we were headed.
It was everything about the time jump and what came after that was poor.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sun May 26, 2019 12:26 am
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm Posts: 39834 Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sun May 26, 2019 12:32 am
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14268
Mickey wrote:
Insufferably bad, dumb, shit writing
Don’t give up, your posting will improve
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Last edited by Bi_3 on Sun May 26, 2019 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sun May 26, 2019 1:40 am
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm Posts: 12085
BurtReynolds wrote:
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
That's absurd.
Count the amount of lines he had other than "you're my queen" or "Dany" or "I don't want it".
I thought he was very good in the throne room scene with Dany. Both were.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
That's absurd.
Count the amount of lines he had other than "you're my queen" or "Dany" or "I don't want it".
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
That's absurd.
Count the amount of lines he had other than "you're my queen" or "Dany" or "I don't want it".
Um... that's literally Jon in every season.
It's not the failure of the actor that he didn't get better is what I'm saying. The writers really didn't give him much more to work with once he was "promoted" to the main character. It didn't help his love story with Dany was so half baked and rushed.
Kit is certainly not on the same level as Dinklage or Lena, but he can hold his own.
Last edited by Monkey_Driven on Sun May 26, 2019 2:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
To be fair, Kit had very little to work with this season.
That's absurd.
Count the amount of lines he had other than "you're my queen" or "Dany" or "I don't want it".
Um... that's literally Jon in every season.
It's not the failure of the actor that he didn't get better is what I'm saying. The writers really didn't give him much more to work with once he was "promoted" to the main character. It didn't help his love story with Dany was so half baked and rushed.
Kit is certainly not on the same level as Dinklage or Lena, but he can hold his own.
There are so many ways to evaluate a series finale. I can understand why opinions vary so much.
I think the final season was good, and I’m pleased with how and where the characters ended up. But I think the final episode was by far the weakest episode, probably of the entire series.
Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sun May 26, 2019 3:59 am
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20881 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
BurtReynolds wrote:
They basically crammed 3 seasons into 3 episodes and unforgivably dropped a half dozen plotlines. Does GoT not make enough money for HBO? Did the makers and actors just get bored with it? Why did they cut it so short?
Who knows.
All and all I'd say the show had some brilliant and groundbreaking scenes and episodes, but it didn't add up to much. And I've never seen a show diverge so much in quality from episode to episode.
It was probably too ambitious, ultimately. Oh well.
The one thing I'll say about the last season is that Emelia Clarke went from a terrible actress to a passable one. Wish I could say the say about that Kit guy.
I saw/heard something about he actors and crew being bored to death in the remote filming locations. Also you could understand with such a large cast that a certain percentage of the actors would want to move on to other things. Unfortunately this is real life.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
