The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10097 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316 ... 505  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Posts: 3404
Location: right there
Next 2 episodes are supposed to be around 80 minutes.

_________________
bada wrote:
Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 26086
Location: Mushroom Kingdom
All I know is Ghost better make an appearance.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1855
Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
well Jon's a legit Targ

To what purpose

Probably none at least in terms of him being king

it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...

not stronger than gendry's though, right? or do you have to be legitimized to inherit the crown?



Yeah from what I understand you have to be a legitimized heir to have a claim. So Jon has the strongest claim. Direct, legitimized descendant of a prince.

Makes all the scenes between Robert and Ned in season 1 a little different, especially the ones in which Robert joked about Ned's 'bastard' son.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Posts: 4737
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
The episode felt unusually rushed and there was no doubt stuff I didn't pick up on (always is) but I still liked. The setup is there for a continued action heavy last two shows.
It really stood out that Jamie & Tyrion's big reunion were filmed separately; like Arrested Development season 4 level.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1855
Oh yeah. The pace was awkward as hell. Some of it was pretty jarring. Going from Dragonstone to King's Landing and back to Dragonstone and finally sailing up to Eastwatch in the span of a afternoon was awkward. Stumbling upon Gendry and him just being all yeah let's go was silly. And a lot of the other scenes seemed contrived too. Like Jorah magically showing up at that exact moment.

Looking forward to the next episode even though the purpose for the mission beyond the wall is pretty damn silly.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
slower than 82% of US
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 7553
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
well Jon's a legit Targ

To what purpose

Probably none at least in terms of him being king

it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...

That may be, but a line in a book won't make him a king unless someone looks for it while they're in a situation to name a king. It was a nod to book/theory readers if anything.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 4:05 pm 
Offline
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1855
Well it gives Jon some added context and it's kind of a big deal that Jon wasn't the product of rape which was the prevailing gossip. The other character that was the product of rape was Ramsey.

It could create some friction between him and Dany as well.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
post-structuralist
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Posts: 4377
Location: faked by jorge
this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.

_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.

Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:21 pm 
Online
User avatar
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 47316
malice wrote:
this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.

I mean, not much really happened except Jon touched a dragon

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:23 pm 
Offline
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1855
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
malice wrote:
this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.

I mean, not much really happened except Jon touched a dragon



Ton of fluff. Just characters meeting and moving around.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
jwfocker wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
well Jon's a legit Targ

To what purpose

Probably none at least in terms of him being king

it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...

not stronger than gendry's though, right? or do you have to be legitimized to inherit the crown?



Yeah from what I understand you have to be a legitimized heir to have a claim. So Jon has the strongest claim. Direct, legitimized descendant of a prince.

Makes all the scenes between Robert and Ned in season 1 a little different, especially the ones in which Robert joked about Ned's 'bastard' son.


Jon is the heir to the Targaryens (son of crown prince Rhaegar, and the grandson of the mad king), he is the second closest living relation to Robert after Gendry (since the Baratheons and Targaryens are related), but the closest that is legitimized, and he is the elected king of the north, and the son of a Stark. It will almost certainly matter somehow, but perhaps not in a way that puts him on the throne.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
dimejinky99 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
because he wants Sansa all to himself



hes not stupid though yet he seems to be at the moment. neither is sansa..she isnt gonna stand by and let herself be used or jon undermined through her...though the scene with arya seems to foreshadow that a bit


What would you do if you were Littlefinger, and wanted to marry Sansa, and rule vast lands? He has to scheme and come up with something special.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Yeah I don't get why Cersei needs to be convinced. They should fortify Moat Cailin to fend off any potential attack from the south, and then focus on what's going on with the WW themselves. If Dany needs proof first she can go for a dragon flight north of the wall and see them.


That would make too much sense.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 26086
Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Anders wrote:
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
post-structuralist
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Posts: 4377
Location: faked by jorge
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.

this

_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.

Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.


Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 26086
Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Anders wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.


Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?


All of the battles have seemed rushed. Part of it is for the element of surprise to the viewer, but the logistics of these battles are left unexplained.

The scenes around the Painted Table have seemed rushed.

Jaime/Cersei has been rushed.

Jon and Dany's relationship is progressing at warp speed.

The Starks at Winterfell have been rushed. Arya "knows" Sansa's true motivations and they've spent like 2 scenes together since they were reunited.

Assembling the Avengers to go north of the wall all happened in like 20 minutes of this episode. Rushed.

In previous seasons all of these would have been explored/shown in much more detail.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39812
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
I wonder how much the actor's salaries go up over the seasons.

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
PostPosted: Mon August 14, 2017 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21056
Location: Oslo, Norway
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.


The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.


Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?


All of the battles have seemed rushed. Part of it is for the element of surprise to the viewer, but the logistics of these battles are left unexplained.

The scenes around the Painted Table have seemed rushed.

Jaime/Cersei has been rushed.

Jon and Dany's relationship is progressing at warp speed.

The Starks at Winterfell have been rushed. Arya "knows" Sansa's true motivations and they've spent like 2 scenes together since they were reunited.

Assembling the Avengers to go north of the wall all happened in like 20 minutes of this episode. Rushed.

In previous seasons all of these would have been explored/shown in much more detail.


Yes, I really loved last week's episode, and have enjoyed the season, but I agree with most of those. There should be more room for relationships to evolve, more scenes between characters to flesh out what is happening, a feel of time passing and people travelling. With the amount of time that has passed elsewhere, Arya might have been back to Winterfell for months already. But it's impossible to tell.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10097 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316 ... 505  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Tue April 23, 2024 11:05 am