Red Mosquito http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
Bill Maher http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=308 |
Page 5 of 27 |
Author: | Stickman [ Sat February 18, 2017 5:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Strat wrote: BurtReynolds wrote: People really shouldn't be afraid to let this guy speak. He is a clown with nothing interesting to say. I agree. I think it was fine. Maher didnt need to start a war with him. He exposed him as being an attention whore and jokester. Though i heard overtime is much more intense so im about to watch that. Larry Wilmore |
Author: | Biff Pocoroba [ Sat February 18, 2017 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Milo is a professional provocateur; he relishes his role as a troll and getting a reaction. I can't take him seriously when he's being douchy but I can take him in discussions when he's not playing that role (which is usually not the case). On a separate point anyone seen any of Leah Remini's Scientology shows on A&E? I've seen a few and it's amazing what people will believe and do with that organization. If you saw the Going Clear doc it's not anything new but still eye opening nonetheless. |
Author: | Jorge [ Sat February 18, 2017 6:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
The Hitchens comparison is so off the mark it's ridiculous |
Author: | LoathedVermin72 [ Sun February 19, 2017 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds. |
Author: | @SkitchP [ Sun February 19, 2017 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
LoathedVermin72 wrote: Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds. Yep, it's like people that refer to themselves as "sarcastic" in assorted social media profiles. |
Author: | BurtReynolds [ Thu February 23, 2017 2:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
LoathedVermin72 wrote: Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds. |
Author: | BurtReynolds [ Thu February 23, 2017 2:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts ... .html?_r=0 He should take credit. Free speech is awesome. |
Author: | Jorge [ Thu February 23, 2017 5:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
BurtReynolds wrote: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts/television/bill-maher-milo-yiannopoulos-interview.html?_r=0 He should take credit. Free speech is awesome. ...?! He didn't actually have anything to do with it though Also from what I saw today Maher seems to have similar views to Milo on the whole age-of-consent thing |
Author: | BurtReynolds [ Thu February 23, 2017 5:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
yeah he really didn't. I liked the interview though. |
Author: | Stickman [ Sat February 25, 2017 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sat March 04, 2017 10:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Mon March 06, 2017 2:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sun March 19, 2017 6:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Wed March 29, 2017 3:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sat April 01, 2017 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sun April 09, 2017 8:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sat April 22, 2017 9:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Mon May 01, 2017 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Author: | Stickman [ Sun May 07, 2017 5:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
One of the better segments in a while |
Author: | Stickman [ Sun May 21, 2017 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bill Maher |
Page 5 of 27 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |