The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284 ... 430  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar
what on earth am I talking about
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 35475
So those two people who made one of the best films ever and followed it up with two of the worst, are making more matrix films

https://www.empireonline.com/movies/new ... x-project/


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
I wonder if they’ll actually be directing. Kinda doubt it.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32472
Location: Where everybody knows your name
I’ve only seen the first one.

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar
what on earth am I talking about
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 35475
Was the direction really the problem with the last two?

I’m gonna way the story was.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 47317
"and 2015’s batshit sci-fi Jupiter Ascending."

Lol

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar
jeeeesus relax already
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Posts: 36213
I dont really care about more matrix movies. We already know how that went.

_________________
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2019 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar
what on earth am I talking about
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 35475
Pulp fiction was released 25 years ago today


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
jeeeesus relax already
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Posts: 36213
Dying to see Midsommar¨

_________________
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 47317
VinylGuy wrote:
Dying to see Midsommar¨

Yeah I'm looking forward to that

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
Today, WB announced a 4K Blu-ray release of The Shining in October. That's already awesome. But this particular bit from the press release is causing some excited speculation:

Quote:
The 4K remastering is of Kubrick’s original 146 minute version of the film which premiered in the United States on May 23rd, 1980.


The American version that's been in circulation since the premiere is 144 minutes, and supposedly that's because Kubrick had two minutes that were shown at the premiere removed from all subsequent prints. From IMDb:

Quote:
Three days after the release of the film, Stanley Kubrick and Warner Bros. ordered all projectionists to cut about 2 minutes from the end of the film, and send the footage back to the studio. Starting after the closeup of frozen Jack, the camera goes to a pullback shot with part of a state trooper's car and the legs of troopers walking around in the foreground. We then cut to the hotel manager Stuart Ullman (Barry Nelson) walking down a hospital hallway to the nurse's station to inquire about Danny and Wendy. He's told they're both doing well and proceeds to Wendy's room. After some gentle conversation, he tells Wendy that searchers have been unable to locate any evidence of the apparitions she saw. Additionally, Jack's body cannot be located. We then cut to the camera silently roaming the halls of the Overlook Hotel for about a minute until it comes up to the wall with the photographs, where it [back to the ending as it is now known] fades in on the photo of Jack in the 1921 picture.


It's pretty insane if the press release is accurate and we're going to finally get to see those "lost" couple of minutes.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:24 am 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78432
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
1. I really feel like I've seen that already. Is it not on YouTube or something?

2. But if SK wanted it removed, isn't it kinda shitty to put it back in?

3. A 4K Shining might get me to buy a new TV & setup.

4. :luv:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:27 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
Unless you saw the premiere in 1980, you’ve never seen it. Kubrick didn’t let that shit out.

Yeah, that’s gonna be a contentious issue, I imagine. Still possible it’s just a mangled press release at this point, though.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78432
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Unless you saw the premiere in 1980, you’ve never seen it. Kubrick didn’t let that shit out.

Yeah, that’s gonna be a contentious issue, I imagine. Still possible it’s just a mangled press release at this point, though.

man, I'm having a real Sinbad is a genie moment on this one


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78432
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
Ah, you know why? It's because I've seen some still frames from it and read the script. I think I may have also seen a YouTube video that showed the stills and had people reading the script over them at one point. That's why.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
The restoration is premiering at Cannes tomorrow and it’s reported to have the lost ending restored. Can’t believe this is happening.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78432
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
The restoration is premiering at Cannes tomorrow and it’s reported to have the lost ending restored. Can’t believe this is happening.

This is super interesting. I'm so torn on whether or not I want this to be included in the film.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
The restoration is premiering at Cannes tomorrow and it’s reported to have the lost ending restored. Can’t believe this is happening.

This is super interesting. I'm so torn on whether or not I want this to be included in the film.

I get that, but I’m just so excited to see it that I don’t care.

Also, if there’s any film for which Kubrick’s infamous perfectionism wasn’t as rigid as usual, it’s this one. I mean, there have been two very different cuts circulating in different territories for decades and Kubrick approved both of them. And technically he did approve this ending as well and showed it to the public, even if he did rescind it afterward.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Legacy of Love
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Posts: 78432
Location: Anarchist Jurisdiction
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
The restoration is premiering at Cannes tomorrow and it’s reported to have the lost ending restored. Can’t believe this is happening.

This is super interesting. I'm so torn on whether or not I want this to be included in the film.

I get that, but I’m just so excited to see it that I don’t care.

Also, if there’s any film for which Kubrick’s infamous perfectionism wasn’t as rigid as usual, it’s this one. I mean, there have been two very different cuts circulating in different territories for decades and Kubrick approved both of them. And technically he did approve this ending as well and showed it to the public, even if he did rescind it afterward.

Fair points.

Still feels like this much [] icky since he's not around to approve this. But I take your meaning and I am excited to see it as well.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Posts: 31614
Location: Garbage Dump
This should make you feel better, Joey. According to the film’s producer, those two minutes were cut at the studio’s behest due to poor critical reception. Kubrick always wanted to keep them in.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/ew.com/mov ... ained/amp/

Quote:
The second outtake was a two-minute hospital scene that was placed after Jack froze to death and before the final shot of the ballroom photograph. In the scene (read the script pages), the hotel manager, Ullman (Barry Nelson), visits Wendy and Danny after their ordeal and explains that no supernatural evidence was found to support their claims of what transpired. Just when the audience begins to question everything they’ve seen, Ullman ominously gives Danny the same ball that was rolled to him from an unseen force outside Room 237.
Johnson: In other words: All of this really happened, and the magic events were actual. It was just a little twist. It was easy to jettison.
The hospital scene was included in the film’s preview screening for critics in New York and Los Angeles. Johnson has previously said Kubrick liked the scene because it reassured the audience that Wendy and Danny were okay. But Ullman giving Danny the ball ramped up audience confusion. So in a unusual move, Kubrick ordered it removed from prints distributed around the country.

Harlan: The tennis ball is the same thing as the photograph — it’s unexplainable. It makes Ullman now another ghost element. Was he the ghost from the very beginning? The film is complex enough because nothing is explained. That non-explaining is what was bad for the film initially. It was not a huge success. Now everybody thinks it’s the best horror film ever or whatever. But when it came out the audience expected a horror film with a resolution, with an explanation. Who is the baddie? What was going on? And they were disappointed — many of them, anyway. The fact they were left puzzled was exactly what Stanley Kubrick wanted. And when the film [screened for critics] and wasn’t well received, Warners quite rightly suggested, “It’s enough, just take [the hospital scene] out.” So Stanley did it. He’s not stubborn, especially since this is a film mainly to entertain people. But Stanley was actually very sad that he misread the audience, that he trusted the audience to live with puzzles and no answers, and that they didn’t like it.

_________________
dimejinky99 wrote:
Take that post and push it off a bridge.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2019 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 34169
Location: Mountains
Chris Rock rebooting the Saw Franchise :lol: wut


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284 ... 430  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » Arts & Entertainment


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Tue April 23, 2024 1:12 pm