The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed January 19, 2022 11:37 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
BurtReynolds wrote:
I never rejoice upon hearing of a sequal
Scurry: The Drowned Forest
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue January 25, 2022 2:08 pm
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm Posts: 32048 Location: Buenos Aires
It was one of my first DVDs. Pretty good special edition, lots of great bonus features. Fincher's DVDs were always packed with interesting stuff. I remember the Se7en DVD was how I learned about color grading, it seemed like magic.
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 8:32 pm
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Sun February 24, 2013 1:56 pm Posts: 847 Location: serious thinking laboratory
There was a report that M. Night Shyamalan was going to shoot his next film Knock at the Cabin in one long take but his reps have now said that is false. Would have been interesting.
Nightmare Alley coming back to theatres, but in black and white. Something like 900 theatres will have it this weekend. Including two around me. I thought this movie was OK, but I guess I'm intrigued by this black and white thing. Is it a gimmick? Should I go look at it?
Nightmare Alley coming back to theatres, but in black and white. Something like 900 theatres will have it this weekend. Including two around me. I thought this movie was OK, but I guess I'm intrigued by this black and white thing. Is it a gimmick? Should I go look at it?
I adore B&W and am almost always please to see it utilized. Watched The Addiction a few weeks ago.
_________________ absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue February 08, 2022 3:05 pm
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm Posts: 4729 Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Academy award nominations were announced today. I used to somewhat keep up with those but that’s been thrown out the window the past couple years. The award ceremony itself has to be better than last year’s; that was awful.
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue February 08, 2022 3:37 pm
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm Posts: 10173 Location: in the air tonight
Obviously, I don't care about the Academy Awards. I don't know what it means...I don't think it means anything. There's too many great movies and you've heard it all before, but..
It always boggles the mind when a group obviously likes a movie but misses the obviously best part of it. Belfast got a bunch of nominations. And it's a fine movie, it's not bad. I even liked it. But Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe are so obviously the best part of that movie. How do voters decide to nominate the grandparents in that movie and skip over the parents? Was there confusion about if they should be Lead or Supporting? I don't get it.
I'm not even saying they were the best performances of the year. I'm just saying they were the best performances in that movie so I'm not sure how voters skipped over them to choose someone else from the same movie.
I think it's because Academy voters are old and want to honor fellow old people. They're jealous of the vim and vigor and vitality and virility and viscosity of Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue February 08, 2022 3:42 pm
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm Posts: 6950
The Argonaut wrote:
Obviously, I don't care about the Academy Awards. I don't know what it means...I don't think it means anything. There's too many great movies and you've heard it all before, but..
It always boggles the mind when a group obviously likes a movie but misses the obviously best part of it. Belfast got a bunch of nominations. And it's a fine movie, it's not bad. I even liked it. But Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe are so obviously the best part of that movie. How do voters decide to nominate the grandparents in that movie and skip over the parents? Was there confusion about if they should be Lead or Supporting? I don't get it.
I'm not even saying they were the best performances of the year. I'm just saying they were the best performances in that movie so I'm not sure how voters skipped over them to choose someone else from the same movie.
I think it's because Academy voters are old and want to honor fellow old people. They're jealous of the vim and vigor and vitality and virility and viscosity of Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue February 08, 2022 3:49 pm
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm Posts: 10173 Location: in the air tonight
JuanHamm wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
Obviously, I don't care about the Academy Awards. I don't know what it means...I don't think it means anything. There's too many great movies and you've heard it all before, but..
It always boggles the mind when a group obviously likes a movie but misses the obviously best part of it. Belfast got a bunch of nominations. And it's a fine movie, it's not bad. I even liked it. But Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe are so obviously the best part of that movie. How do voters decide to nominate the grandparents in that movie and skip over the parents? Was there confusion about if they should be Lead or Supporting? I don't get it.
I'm not even saying they were the best performances of the year. I'm just saying they were the best performances in that movie so I'm not sure how voters skipped over them to choose someone else from the same movie.
I think it's because Academy voters are old and want to honor fellow old people. They're jealous of the vim and vigor and vitality and virility and viscosity of Jamie Dornan and Caitríona Balfe
It seems like you do care.
It's more that I care about Jamie Dornan and women with Irish accents than that I care about the Academy Awards. I have a lot of love in my heart for Jamie Dornan and women with Irish accents
Post subject: Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue February 08, 2022 3:50 pm
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm Posts: 10173 Location: in the air tonight
VinylGuy wrote:
i cant imagine watching Belfast. I couldnt even finish the trailer.
The same with that Coda movie.
CODA made me cry, but not, like in a good way. I could feel myself being manipulated. And I'm also a sucker for that kind of movie because, even though I am childless, I think I have the soul of a father of daughters
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum