The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
How do you digest an artists discography that is extensive and all, or mostly all, unknown to you? Slowly or quickly? 1 album a day, week, month? Multiple albums a day, week, month?
How do you digest an artists discography that is extensive and all, or mostly all, unknown to you? Slowly or quickly? 1 album a day, week, month? Multiple albums a day, week, month?
For Radiohead and Oasis, I spend at least a month on each release and realted tracks before going onto the next. Starting from the first release. With Smashing Pumpkins, I've consumed each re-issue as it has been released. Lots of time between releases. Though I am still digesting Adore and MCIS. MCIS is just holy fuck and immense.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Leatherhead wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Start with an album and listen for as long as you want. When you're ready to move on, move on.
Chronological or no?
Sometimes. Do you want to listen chronologically? Or would you rather start with something in the middle that stands out? There's no wrong answer here.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47181 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Start with an album and listen for as long as you want. When you're ready to move on, move on.
Chronological or no?
Sometimes. Do you want to listen chronologically? Or would you rather start with something in the middle that stands out? There's no wrong answer here.
I think that before proper guidance can be offered, we need to know whose discography Leatherhead is checking out. For example, if it were Fugazi, I'd say start somewhere in the middle. If it were Bill Callahan, I'd say start somewhere around 2000. But if it were Sonic Youth, I'd say start at the beginning.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
tragabigzanda wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Start with an album and listen for as long as you want. When you're ready to move on, move on.
Chronological or no?
Sometimes. Do you want to listen chronologically? Or would you rather start with something in the middle that stands out? There's no wrong answer here.
I think that before proper guidance can be offered, we need to know whose discography Leatherhead is checking out. For example, if it were Fugazi, I'd say start somewhere in the middle. If it were Bill Callahan, I'd say start somewhere around 2000. But if it were Sonic Youth, I'd say start at the beginning.
I went with REM chronologically and that worked great.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47181 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
cutuphalfdead wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Start with an album and listen for as long as you want. When you're ready to move on, move on.
Chronological or no?
Sometimes. Do you want to listen chronologically? Or would you rather start with something in the middle that stands out? There's no wrong answer here.
I think that before proper guidance can be offered, we need to know whose discography Leatherhead is checking out. For example, if it were Fugazi, I'd say start somewhere in the middle. If it were Bill Callahan, I'd say start somewhere around 2000. But if it were Sonic Youth, I'd say start at the beginning.
I went with REM chronologically and that worked great.
Yea, I think REM is another start-from-the-beginning band.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm Posts: 9359 Location: Washington State
Hmm, good question. I just 'found' Public Image Ltd by way of The Clash so I'm going through their respective catalogs. Basically starting at the front and going forward with them since I seem to recall both bands were 'new' to music so it would make more sense to get into them and then listen to them grow.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am Posts: 35495
I used to do this sorta intensely. Say Springsteen. I'd get the best biography and then work through the discography as I was going through the book. Can't remember which one but there was a book on him that was really informative about the recording of each album and contributions from the band members.
Then I stopped liking music in any kind of serious way a few years ago and stopped.
Users browsing this forum: oneway23 and 100 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum