Switch to full style
Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post a reply

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 8:11 pm

I totally understand one's disinterest in a band like Band of Horses. But I goddamn love them. They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for. I'll just sip my whiskey and quietly appreciate them while others hash it out.

Those first three records really move me.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 8:16 pm

Me too, pal.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 8:26 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for.


Do you mean "go to the mat?"

"Going to the mattresses" makes me imagine you giving yourself up physically in exchange for someone's commitment to alter their view.

I mean, either way. I was just wondering.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 8:27 pm

Kevin Davis wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for.


Do you mean "go to the mat?"

"Going to the mattresses" makes me imagine you giving yourself up physically in exchange for someone's commitment to alter their view.

I mean, either way. I was just wondering.

i think your interpretation is correct

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 8:53 pm

Like the first 2 albums. Saw em live and it was overall pretty flat. Not enough to sustain 90mins+.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 10:16 pm

Kevin Davis wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for.


Do you mean "go to the mat?"

"Going to the mattresses" makes me imagine you giving yourself up physically in exchange for someone's commitment to alter their view.

I mean, either way. I was just wondering.

It's... it's a Godfather reference.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 10:17 pm

LetMeSleep wrote:Like the first 2 albums. Saw em live and it was overall pretty flat. Not enough to sustain 90mins+.

I saw them open for PJ and it was a lovely set. But shorter than 90 mins, obviously. And Ben sang Hunger Strike with Ed at the end and that was one of the highlights of my concert going life.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 10:36 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
LetMeSleep wrote:Like the first 2 albums. Saw em live and it was overall pretty flat. Not enough to sustain 90mins+.

I saw them open for PJ and it was a lovely set. But shorter than 90 mins, obviously. And Ben sang Hunger Strike with Ed at the end and that was one of the highlights of my concert going life.

A shorter set would be great, 45-60mins.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 10:42 pm

LetMeSleep wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LetMeSleep wrote:Like the first 2 albums. Saw em live and it was overall pretty flat. Not enough to sustain 90mins+.

I saw them open for PJ and it was a lovely set. But shorter than 90 mins, obviously. And Ben sang Hunger Strike with Ed at the end and that was one of the highlights of my concert going life.

A shorter set would be great, 45-60mins.

:nice:

Yeah, that was the sweet spot.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 11:04 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for.


Do you mean "go to the mat?"

"Going to the mattresses" makes me imagine you giving yourself up physically in exchange for someone's commitment to alter their view.

I mean, either way. I was just wondering.

It's... it's a Godfather reference.


Oh.

That's kind of embarrassing. I should probably know Godfather references.

So does it mean loosely what I took it to mean?

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 11:05 pm

Kevin Davis wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:They aren't a band I'll go to the mattresses for.


Do you mean "go to the mat?"

"Going to the mattresses" makes me imagine you giving yourself up physically in exchange for someone's commitment to alter their view.

I mean, either way. I was just wondering.

It's... it's a Godfather reference.


Oh.

That's kind of embarrassing. I should probably know Godfather references.

So does it mean loosely what I took it to mean?

It....uh... it does not. No.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 11:35 pm

Oh well. At least we're on the same side of this whole thing, J. Wanna listen to "Infinite Arms" tonight and pretend we're listening to it together?

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon December 28, 2015 11:37 pm

Kevin Davis wrote:Oh well. At least we're on the same side of this whole thing, J. Wanna listen to "Infinite Arms" tonight and pretend we're listening to it together?

:luv:

Always.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Tue December 29, 2015 1:55 am

Cease to Begin is a lovely little record.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Tue December 29, 2015 11:19 am

tragabigzanda wrote:
Kaius wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
bada wrote:Everything humans do is based on ego. Even complaining someone has an ego strokes the accusers ego allowing them to feel superior. Parsing bands motivations is so 1991.


Not saying I don't have an ego, or that artists shouldn't. Trying to say that great music either A) attempts to push boundaries or B) doesn't try to present itself as more important than it really is (like Kesha, Katy Perry, et al). Anything else is just noise to my ears.

I don't know. That's seems like an ironically narrow-minded view of what makes good art.


It's an unfortunately jaded opinion born from years of working with mediocre bands. I'm working on it.

One of the subtle but important shifts in how I consume and appreciate art over the last decade was ceasing to really care about an artists motivations behind why they do what they do. The story and motivations can provide an enlightening bit of context that can enhance an experience, but what matters is the way the audience (critical, public, and self) perceives and appreciates the result.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon July 11, 2016 6:14 pm

Forgot we had a dedicated thread.

New record is solid. Listened twice the other night and I really enjoy it. I think it's gonna open up a lot on further listening, too. Very pleased.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon July 11, 2016 6:42 pm

Love Cease To Begin and Everything All The Time. Both have been in heavy rotation here since 2007. Really weird discussion in this thread. Didn't really expect anything else though.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon July 11, 2016 6:45 pm

I'd put Infinite Arms above Everything All the Time. And, yes, I'm aware that I'm the only one who would. :lol:

But all three (including Cease) are great records. I listen to all three all the time, the rotation just depends on my mood. This new one will be a welcomed addition.

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon July 11, 2016 8:48 pm

I wouldn't, Joey, but I really like "Infinite Arms."

Re: there's not a band of horses thr

Mon July 11, 2016 10:31 pm

Post a reply