The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 2:37 pm
The Master
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am Posts: 28154
He has a point. Are you worried about what this person who you’ll never meet thinks of your personally? Cuz otherwise, they’re simply asking for too much money. Open and shut.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 2:50 pm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm Posts: 20776 Location: the bathroom
Let them think what they’re gonna think, that’s their issue. It’s out of your control.
If it still weighs on you, schedule a phone screen and focus on the salary, and let them decide if it’s something they want to pursue. But only if you think they’re a possible good employee.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 3:14 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32497 Location: Where everybody knows your name
spike wrote:
He has a point. Are you worried about what this person who you’ll never meet thinks of your personally? Cuz otherwise, they’re simply asking for too much money. Open and shut.
No, not me personally. I’ll never have contact with the person. Just don’t want them to think that was the reason they were turned down.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 4:29 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
wease wrote:
spike wrote:
He has a point. Are you worried about what this person who you’ll never meet thinks of your personally? Cuz otherwise, they’re simply asking for too much money. Open and shut.
No, not me personally. I’ll never have contact with the person. Just don’t want them to think that was the reason they were turned down.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 4:31 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 4:39 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32497 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 4:44 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 4:46 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
The idea actually makes a little bit of sense on one hand if you had the full context, but on the much stronger other hand it’s a part time job that commands part time pay.
You don’t pay more than the work is worth, period.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 5:04 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32497 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Right. I was explaining my agreement with you.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 5:19 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Right. I was explaining my agreement with you.
So you can sleep at night after passing on that applicant you’re all wound up about.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 6:10 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32497 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Right. I was explaining my agreement with you.
So you can sleep at night after passing on that applicant you’re all wound up about.
Oh, I slept just fine.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 6:22 pm
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm Posts: 32286 Location: Buenos Aires
Man, between Wease's "I don't want this applicant to think I'm transphobic" and Ruddo's "I will burn my own corneas off before I turn my head in the general direction of a lady in a swimsuit" I'm starting to think some of you have issues
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 6:29 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20865 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Right. I was explaining my agreement with you.
So you can sleep at night after passing on that applicant you’re all wound up about.
Oh, I slept just fine.
Bro you posted like ten sentences about the internal conflict you’re having over it.
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 6:37 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32497 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I’ll spare you the context but I was recently asked how I would incorporate DEI into pay levels and I said that I would not. The job is the job.
Why would that be worked into pay levels? In what way would they expect it to be?
It was about paying a higher amount so that the job would be attractive to a more diverse candidate pool. Basically paying FT salary and full benefits package for a PT job.
(There are plenty of people interested in the job, this is not for lack of interest)
More money isn’t going to attract a more diverse pool of applicants. It would more than likely attract a larger pool but I would T think it would be more diverse.
Again my answer was that I wouldn’t support this idea to incorporate DEI into pay scale.
Right. I was explaining my agreement with you.
So you can sleep at night after passing on that applicant you’re all wound up about.
Oh, I slept just fine.
Bro you posted like ten sentences about the internal conflict you’re having over it.
Pitch the fucking resumé and move on.
I did exactly that this morning. I appreciate your counsel.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Posted: Fri June 17, 2022 6:41 pm
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm Posts: 47339
Jorge wrote:
Man, between Wease's "I don't want this applicant to think I'm transphobic" and Ruddo's "I will burn my own corneas off before I turn my head in the general direction of a lady in a swimsuit" I'm starting to think some of you have issues
In my defense, my scenario involved a different demographic than what daft twat originally mentioned. If they were my wife's friends out there in bikinis I would be out there no question.
_________________ Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum