The Proud Boy guy who got arrested for burning a BLM banner kinda smacked of selective prosecution for something that wouldn't normally get much in the way of police resources. But then of course it comes out that he's been bragging to the media about his actions. I don't think prosecutors can look the other way when you incriminate yourself so openly. Who wouldn't want to try such an open and shut case?

everything happens for a reason

maybe he and mumia abu jamal will meet in jail and fall in love

*eyeroll*

Oh come on Burt, it’s Mother Jones, you could at least groan first.

If this book triggers you:



... your snowflake ass might be able to handle this:

Have you apologized for being white today, b?

Nevermind. Both of those books will trigger you.

I'm sure they're great for the crowd that thinks that if the Capitol rioters were black, they'd be mowed down an masse by racist cops on live tv, rather than bailed out by celebrities and billionaires before the sun came up and lauded as freedom fighters by the media and every single multinational corporation in existence.

My 8yr old daughter was invited by her brother to play Among Us with his friends. She was very excited until he came into the room to tell her she couldn't use the name KKKitty.

I don't know how long she's been using that name to play on-line.

'sweetie, I'm sorry - but if you keep using that name, you might get elected to the House of Representatives - and that's not a job that pays really well'

Good read:

WaPo: From memes to race war: How extremists use popular culture to lure recruits
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... community/

Interesting, but reads more like a veiled argument for censorship.

One of these propagandists rewrite this same bullshit article every month, and have been since 2016.

"Don't let your kids on the internets! The right will turn them into Nazis!"

Post something the Washington Post doesn't approve of? You must be a nazi white supremacist conspiracy theorist Russian terrorist!

You sure got em. They refused to stop writing about the problem even though the problem didn’t go away.


This article is discussing content like this, not some tepid meme that a middle aged man posted on a message board.

I don’t understand why you look at reporting on content like that and think “(eye roll) looks like someone said something the Washington Post doesn’t like.”

Because it's the same fearmongering bullshit over and over, made by the same idiots who tried to convince us that Dungeons and Dragons and heavy metal music turned kids into devil worshippers.

This is not a problem and no, memes aren't turning people into Nazis.

The real purpose of these articles is to jumble any dissension in together with the most extreme white supremacy in order to discredit any and all dissension, and it doesn't stop with only right wing dissension.


"QAnon? neo-nazis? men's rights activists? conspiracy theorists? homicidal mass-murderers? Republican voters? Boogaloo boys? Its all the same thing, bro! It's all a pipeline to nazi Germany part 2! Trust us!"

Going hard on this topic, we can dig up more I bet: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/ ... et-science


Does this tie back to the Canadian law being considered where all online content can be federally regulated?

Something you should actually be worried about, from people in actual positions of power. But you aren't. Because you've been trained to to believe the Klan is on the verge of a hostile takeover of the United States.