Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Tue October 10, 2017 10:11 pm
Dev wrote:Gav rules but im not a beta so I can deal with it.
Dev you're a total fucking beta, who the hell are you kidding? You're one of the pansiest, fragilest people here. Don't front
Tue October 10, 2017 10:12 pm
Tue October 10, 2017 10:13 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tue October 10, 2017 10:13 pm
Yes he is
Tue October 10, 2017 10:14 pm
And he's gonna fucking like it
Tue October 10, 2017 10:19 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tue October 10, 2017 10:22 pm
Wed October 11, 2017 5:44 am
just cuz im clinically depressed doesn't mean im not a total gangster.
Wed October 11, 2017 10:05 am
Wed October 11, 2017 5:38 pm
"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
Wed October 11, 2017 6:58 pm
McParadigm wrote:"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.
Wed October 11, 2017 7:24 pm
Bi_3 wrote:McParadigm wrote:"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.
Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.
Plus it's California, so the moment you assume it's too absurd to be true...
Wed October 11, 2017 8:02 pm
Shouldn't the Trump 45 thread be retitled Adventures in Babysitting?
Wed October 11, 2017 8:42 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed October 11, 2017 10:29 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Wed October 11, 2017 10:48 pm
An article on a website called ONE ANGRY GAMER complaining about the SJW agenda goddammit Burt my targeted ads are gonna fucking suck this week
Wed October 11, 2017 10:53 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed October 11, 2017 11:05 pm
I still don't know what that actually means and I really couldn't be arsed to do the research.
Wed October 11, 2017 11:05 pm
.
Last edited by
BurtReynolds on Mon March 06, 2023 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed October 11, 2017 11:09 pm
The wife and I would like to thank you for having us to your dinner party.
Last edited by
The Argonaut on Wed June 19, 2019 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.