The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Basically, woman files false domestic abuse charges, man spends 19 days in jail before she recants. She is charged and sentenced to 60 days. Judge says she has hurt every victim of abuse, making it harder for them to come forward. While that's factual, what about the true victim of this crime the man who spent 19 days in jail?
Imagine if a judge in finding a man guilty of rape said the real victims were other men who were now not going to be trusted as much by women.
Seems like the judge was saying both the innocent husband AND victims of real abuse are harmed by the false accusation.
“When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
Would love to see how that flies if said about a rapist.
When victimhood is such a coveted status that the judge feels it is appropriate when a woman has directly harmed a man that she has also harmed women. By that logic mean are the real victims of almost everything. More men go through the court system, usually with only a single victim (male or female) but also victimizing every other man along the way.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Basically, woman files false domestic abuse charges, man spends 19 days in jail before she recants. She is charged and sentenced to 60 days. Judge says she has hurt every victim of abuse, making it harder for them to come forward. While that's factual, what about the true victim of this crime the man who spent 19 days in jail?
Imagine if a judge in finding a man guilty of rape said the real victims were other men who were now not going to be trusted as much by women.
Seems like the judge was saying both the innocent husband AND victims of real abuse are harmed by the false accusation.
“When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
Would love to see how that flies if said about a rapist.
When victimhood is such a coveted status that the judge feels it is appropriate when a woman has directly harmed a man that she has also harmed women. By that logic mean are the real victims of almost everything. More men go through the court system, usually with only a single victim (male or female) but also victimizing every other man along the way.
I don't think victimhood is a "coveted status" for the victims. Jesus Christ, what a fucking dickhead post.
Basically, woman files false domestic abuse charges, man spends 19 days in jail before she recants. She is charged and sentenced to 60 days. Judge says she has hurt every victim of abuse, making it harder for them to come forward. While that's factual, what about the true victim of this crime the man who spent 19 days in jail?
Imagine if a judge in finding a man guilty of rape said the real victims were other men who were now not going to be trusted as much by women.
Seems like the judge was saying both the innocent husband AND victims of real abuse are harmed by the false accusation.
“When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
Would love to see how that flies if said about a rapist.
When victimhood is such a coveted status that the judge feels it is appropriate when a woman has directly harmed a man that she has also harmed women. By that logic mean are the real victims of almost everything. More men go through the court system, usually with only a single victim (male or female) but also victimizing every other man along the way.
I don't think victimhood is a "coveted status" for the victims. Jesus Christ, what a fucking dickhead post.
He has some women hating issues
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Basically, woman files false domestic abuse charges, man spends 19 days in jail before she recants. She is charged and sentenced to 60 days. Judge says she has hurt every victim of abuse, making it harder for them to come forward. While that's factual, what about the true victim of this crime the man who spent 19 days in jail?
Imagine if a judge in finding a man guilty of rape said the real victims were other men who were now not going to be trusted as much by women.
Seems like the judge was saying both the innocent husband AND victims of real abuse are harmed by the false accusation.
“When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
Would love to see how that flies if said about a rapist.
When victimhood is such a coveted status that the judge feels it is appropriate when a woman has directly harmed a man that she has also harmed women. By that logic mean are the real victims of almost everything. More men go through the court system, usually with only a single victim (male or female) but also victimizing every other man along the way.
Are you trying to show how annoying snowflakes are by making yourself (and I guess men in general) out to be one?
Basically, woman files false domestic abuse charges, man spends 19 days in jail before she recants. She is charged and sentenced to 60 days. Judge says she has hurt every victim of abuse, making it harder for them to come forward. While that's factual, what about the true victim of this crime the man who spent 19 days in jail?
Imagine if a judge in finding a man guilty of rape said the real victims were other men who were now not going to be trusted as much by women.
Seems like the judge was saying both the innocent husband AND victims of real abuse are harmed by the false accusation.
“When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
Would love to see how that flies if said about a rapist.
When victimhood is such a coveted status that the judge feels it is appropriate when a woman has directly harmed a man that she has also harmed women. By that logic mean are the real victims of almost everything. More men go through the court system, usually with only a single victim (male or female) but also victimizing every other man along the way.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri June 02, 2017 10:37 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm Posts: 9359 Location: Washington State
Dev wrote:
THIS
That's a scary thumbnail. I'm not sure I want to watch that guy take a shit. Or have a heart attack. Or whatever it is he's about to do, it looks painful.
Yeah, this is the story making me angriest right now. It's just so ugly and embarrassing.
Ethnoseparatism is a logical midpoint of post-modernist thought. What makes this story so tragic is not the students, they are free to think what they want, but the adults that are so terrified of them that they cower before what is clearly violent intimidation of their peers. They seem to think if they agree to the mobs demands, that's the end of it, like a scared child that's defends a schoolyard bully to avoid being hassled next
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat June 03, 2017 10:00 pm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am Posts: 21842
A little context helps.
Weinstein has been an increasingly polarizing figure there, as he has previously opposed other race-related efforts (including efforts to diversify the faculty) and ran to Tucker Carlson and other hard right media to "plead" his case / put the university down. Regardless of the merits of the effort, the perception there is that he likes to publicize himself at the U's expense (it doesn't help that he didn't pitch this fit in earlier years, when it was people of color who were staying away from campus for a day).
It doesn't surprise me that the NYT locked into the Breitbart version of this...but it does disappoint.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
