The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Tue November 30, 2021 2:30 pm
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14220
spike wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Stop shaming those ash borers, lanternflys, and murder hornets you sick bigots.
just see what happens when you shame a polar bear!
Eh. One of the few noninvasive white animals
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri January 14, 2022 3:10 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20850 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
Don’t get me wrong, I love the convenience of voting by mail, but if I had to walk or drive my ass to the polling station and show my ID, that’s what I would do.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri January 14, 2022 4:07 pm
See you in another life, brother
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm Posts: 6648
Bammer wrote:
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
That's the intention even if it fails.
_________________ "I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri January 14, 2022 4:14 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
With all your compassion for the homeless and indigent population, you really can’t see this?
You should drive your ass through the Mississippi delta and see how easy it is for folks down there to get a new driver's license, much less get to their polling place.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri January 14, 2022 4:31 pm
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32433 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Mickey wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
With all your compassion for the homeless and indigent population, you really can’t see this?
You should drive your ass through the Mississippi delta and see how easy it is for folks down there to get a new driver's license, much less get to their polling place.
Are you ordering me to do this? It seems like we’re on the same side here.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri January 14, 2022 4:37 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
wease wrote:
Mickey wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
With all your compassion for the homeless and indigent population, you really can’t see this?
You should drive your ass through the Mississippi delta and see how easy it is for folks down there to get a new driver's license, much less get to their polling place.
Are you ordering me to do this? It seems like we’re on the same side here.
Should have been clear--I meant Bammer.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat January 15, 2022 4:52 am
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20850 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Mickey wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Does anyone here buy the claim that requiring photo ID is “voter suppression”?
With all your compassion for the homeless and indigent population, you really can’t see this?
You should drive your ass through the Mississippi delta and see how easy it is for folks down there to get a new driver's license, much less get to their polling place.
I have waited in many a very long line to renew mine just like everyone else.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat January 15, 2022 1:28 pm
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm Posts: 47219
I don’t think he’s talking about long lines bammer. More like far distances to get there and limited transportation available. Not everyone can afford a car fyi
_________________ Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat January 15, 2022 3:05 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20850 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
I don’t think he’s talking about long lines bammer. More like far distances to get there and limited transportation available. Not everyone can afford a car fyi
There's an answer to this that doesn't include getting rid of ID requirements. Voter suppression does exist (though it's tremendously overstated), but its not because of ID requirements, something which is the norm everywhere else on earth.
Yes I am talking about ID requirements.
Ok so put at least X polling places per zip code. Or X per every XX people within a X mile radius.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat January 15, 2022 3:16 pm
Mind Your Tanners
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
I don’t think he’s talking about long lines bammer. More like far distances to get there and limited transportation available. Not everyone can afford a car fyi
There's an answer to this that doesn't include getting rid of ID requirements. Voter suppression does exist (though it's tremendously overstated), but its not because of ID requirements, something which is the norm everywhere else on earth.
But you can't talk about ID requirements as if they're a value-neutral policy without taking into consideration the underlying infrastructure. Or rather--sure, it's not the voter ID requirement that's the problem, it's the time and money associated with getting an ID, making sure it's up-to-date, and then supplying it in person on election day. But then the requirement becomes the node at which this unequally distributed burden is felt.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post subject: Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Sat January 15, 2022 3:20 pm
mXn
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20850 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Mickey wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
I don’t think he’s talking about long lines bammer. More like far distances to get there and limited transportation available. Not everyone can afford a car fyi
There's an answer to this that doesn't include getting rid of ID requirements. Voter suppression does exist (though it's tremendously overstated), but its not because of ID requirements, something which is the norm everywhere else on earth.
But you can't talk about ID requirements as if they're a value-neutral policy without taking into consideration the underlying infrastructure. Or rather--sure, it's not the voter ID requirement that's the problem, it's the time and money associated with getting an ID, making sure it's up-to-date, and then supplying it in person on election day. But then the requirement becomes the node at which this unequally distributed burden is felt.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
