Sun May 21, 2017 2:17 am
Mon May 22, 2017 9:55 pm
Bi_3 wrote:"We assumed that if we were merely clear in our moral implications that maleness is intrinsically bad and that the penis is somehow at the root of it, we could get the paper published in a respectable journal."
http://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05/19/hoax-science-paper-says-penis-social-construct-worsens-climate-change-11302?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
In their tell-all article in Skeptic, the authors admit they jammed the paper full of jargon and made it purposefully incoherent.
A new team of hoaxers has struck again, this time in the journal Cogent Social Science.
Wed June 07, 2017 10:26 pm
Mon July 31, 2017 9:30 pm
Mon July 31, 2017 9:50 pm
Mon July 31, 2017 9:55 pm
Sun November 05, 2017 3:02 am
Sun November 05, 2017 8:12 am
Wed November 15, 2017 2:13 am