Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Thu November 09, 2023 8:00 pm
dad wrote:why would we want to change anything when we can keep trotting out these old white dudes?
We tried a middle aged black guy and he bombed so many people he got himself into the collateral damage hall of fame (and got a Nobel Peace Prize in the process).
Sun November 12, 2023 8:02 am
Wed November 15, 2023 4:11 pm
2 things:
I immediately put up both my middle digits when orange boy appeared; and
"American Badass" is the gheyest (not that there's anything wrong with that) song title ever.
Tue January 09, 2024 11:03 am
If these Epstein revelations aren’t enough to stop him in Iowa, the red team has lost their soul
Tue January 09, 2024 12:16 pm
hahahahaha. you believe they have one?
Tue January 09, 2024 12:17 pm
Can we change the thread title to Doe 174 - Donald J Trump?
This won’t change anything. He’s still the MAGA supreme being. The rest of the republicans will still hate him but support him. None of his primary challengers will even mention it except to make excuses for it besides Christie.
Tue January 09, 2024 4:30 pm
I'm not watching, but word is the judges so far are skeptical of Trump's immunity defense.
Tue January 09, 2024 5:33 pm
Tue January 09, 2024 8:52 pm
Oh god damn it.
Even if this kills GA, there are over 80 felonies remaining, but his creeps will claim he's exonerated for everything.
Tue January 09, 2024 10:03 pm
The document offers no concrete proof of the romantic ties between Willis and Wade, but says “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”
If you can document a relationship that is consequential to the state of prosecution, then you should do it…because that is what makes this a story. If you can’t, it’s not.
Or, to quote Greta Van Susteren’s previous statements on the topic, “There are truthful complaints and there are false complaints. When you’re trying to get through what’s true and what’s false, you look at corroborating or lack of corroborating evidence.”
Tue January 09, 2024 10:31 pm
McParadigm wrote:The document offers no concrete proof of the romantic ties between Willis and Wade, but says “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney have confirmed they had an ongoing, personal relationship.”
If you can document a relationship that is consequential to the state of prosecution,
then you should do it…because that is what makes this a story. If you can’t, it’s not.
Or, to quote Greta Van Susteren’s previous statements on the topic, “There are truthful complaints and there are false complaints. When you’re trying to get through what’s true and what’s false, you look at corroborating or lack of corroborating evidence.”
I struggle to believe the state would have allowed her to appoint her then-married boyfriend to be special counsel in an unprecedented case against a former President and current leading Presidential candidate just because she disclosed she was banging him. (This situation does not invalidate the significant evidence against Trump & co. in GA)
Tue January 09, 2024 11:27 pm
witch huuuuunt!
Wed January 10, 2024 9:28 pm
‘BREAKING: Donald Trump Asks Judge If He Can Shoot Someone in the Middle of Fifth Avenue During Recess, Judge Responds “Can You or May You,” Court Erupts Into Laughter’
Haha
Thu January 11, 2024 2:13 am
He is an actual rapist
Fri January 12, 2024 2:04 pm
So by Trump’s and his lawyers’ line of reasoning, Biden could send a hit squad out to eliminate Trump, and it’s all legal and perfectly fine. C’mon, Joe. Take him up on it.
Fri January 12, 2024 6:47 pm
wease wrote:So by Trump’s and his lawyers’ line of reasoning, Biden could send a hit squad out to eliminate Trump, and it’s all legal and perfectly fine. C’mon, Joe. Take him up on it.
Maybe Joe should AT LEAST wait until a court rules on that reasoning.
Fri January 12, 2024 9:44 pm
B wrote:wease wrote:So by Trump’s and his lawyers’ line of reasoning, Biden could send a hit squad out to eliminate Trump, and it’s all legal and perfectly fine. C’mon, Joe. Take him up on it.
Maybe Joe should AT LEAST wait until a court rules on that reasoning.
Stop witch hunting Joe.
Fri January 19, 2024 3:04 am
dimejinky99 wrote:Always found it strange there’s an age requirement to get to be POTIS but not a limit on age.
How do you guys fix that? Surely after this coming campaign it needs fixing.
By voting for younger candidates.
Fri January 19, 2024 3:46 am
Bammer has never voted for anyone age 70 or older.
Be more like Bammer.
Fri January 19, 2024 1:52 pm
You have to give it to the guy for being a tall fat guy still going at it at the age of 77. he's an inspiration to tall, fat guys everywhere. Complete self-absorption and a supreme persecution complex are powerful motivators.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.