Red Mosquito • View topic - The 45th POTUS

Higgs · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 11:25 am

"I think I've done this right...

I'll just see what Mel's got down."

Higgs · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 11:26 am

On board the 1500 train.

Although, as I think of it, 1600 would be more appropriate.

Higgs · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 11:30 am

I guess when English for you is a made up language the literacy of someone with English as a second language is a better bet.

Peeps · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm **Posts:** 5827

Rangi Guy wrote:

Higgs wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Isn't the White House currently the most infected place in all of the USA?

That's what I was thinking. Who in the hell would send their kids there?

supreme court elect apparently

B · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 1:03 pm

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Yes, I think the President, all Cabinet Members, all Senators, all Representatives, and all Supreme Court Justices should wear a mask whenever they are in public regardless of their COVID status and regardless of distance from others for two reasons. One, we don't REALLY know when a person starts or stops being infectious or how long they are immune after infection. Two, it's a message to all of the American public from their leaders that masks are normal and important.

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 2:25 pm

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Yes, I think the President, all Cabinet Members, all Senators, all Representatives, and all Supreme Court Justices should wear a mask whenever they are in public regardless of their COVID status and regardless of distance from others for two reasons. One, we don't REALLY know when a person starts or stops being infectious or how long they are immune after infection. Two, it's a message to all of the American public from their leaders that masks are normal and important.

The second part makes a fair point I guess.

spike · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am **Posts:** 28173

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

Ello Sailor · **Joined:** Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm **Posts:** 11854

spike · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am **Posts:** 28173

I mean, do we know if verb has left his house since spring? Not sure he really gets what’s happening out there in reality.

B · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 3:32 pm

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

spike · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am **Posts:** 28173

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

B · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 3:40 pm

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

Obviously. Glad you're sister's healthy.

Chris_H_2 · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 3:58 pm

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 4:34 pm

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

To try and lure me into battle

spike · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am **Posts:** 28173

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 5:31 pm

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

JuanHamm · **Joined:** Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm **Posts:** 6950

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

But do you like it?

doug rr · **Posted:** Mon October 26, 2020 5:33 pm

spike · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am **Posts:** 28173

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

Because JB says you have to. You don’t seem to believe in it.

The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Who is online