Red Mosquito • View topic - The 45th POTUS

Bi_3 · **Joined:** Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm **Posts:** 14254

bune wrote:

B · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 5:47 pm

McParadigm wrote:

Party of adults

I don't understand this logic.

You lied before, so we can't trust you now. Does that mean he's lying now? If so, he wasn't lying before, and you're reason for calling him a liar just fell apart.

McParadigm · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am **Posts:** 21836

McParadigm · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am **Posts:** 21836

B wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Party of adults

I don't understand this logic.

You lied before, so we can't trust you now. Does that mean he's lying now? If so, he wasn't lying before, and you're reason for calling him a liar just fell apart.

Quote:

I’m still baffled that “he’s already admitted to lying for the president” is their entire case for why you shouldn’t believe his descriptions of lying for the president.

Bi_3 · **Joined:** Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm **Posts:** 14254

B wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Party of adults

I don't understand this logic.

You lied before, so we can't trust you now. Does that mean he's lying now? If so, he wasn't lying before, and you're reason for calling him a liar just fell apart.

Well, he was convicted and disbarred for lying under oath... why not lie again to save some jail time? It’s not either or.

But i suspect he is telling the truth to his time. It will be interesting to see how Stone responds. (Probably by saying “I need something different”)

Simple Torture · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 5:56 pm

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Party of adults

I don't understand this logic.

You lied before, so we can't trust you now. Does that mean he's lying now? If so, he wasn't lying before, and you're reason for calling him a liar just fell apart.

Well, he was convicted and disbarred for lying under oath... why not lie again to save some jail time? It’s not either or.

But i suspect he is telling the truth to his time. It will be interesting to see how Stone responds. (Probably by saying “I need something different”)

I was under the impression that his sentence cannot be reduced since it's already been handed down. He got caught lying the first time--one would think (the Dems should hit this point hard) that the only thing he could get from lying again is more prison time.

doug rr · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 5:57 pm

why are they so hung up on future book/movie deals?

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 5:57 pm

McParadigm wrote:

Yeah I saw this tweet. Trump wants Cohen to be seen as a liar. Is Junior really this stupid?

McParadigm · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am **Posts:** 21836

Simple Torture wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Party of adults

I don't understand this logic.

You lied before, so we can't trust you now. Does that mean he's lying now? If so, he wasn't lying before, and you're reason for calling him a liar just fell apart.

Well, he was convicted and disbarred for lying under oath... why not lie again to save some jail time? It’s not either or.

But i suspect he is telling the truth to his time. It will be interesting to see how Stone responds. (Probably by saying “I need something different”)

I was under the impression that his sentence cannot be reduced since it's already been handed down. He got caught lying the first time--one would think (the Dems should hit this point hard) that the only thing he could get from lying again is more prison time.

He can’t officially get a shorter sentence for truth telling here, but it can influence other decisions. Also, he can be charged anew for any lies he tells now. And, certainly, investigators would be watching for any inconsistencies.

B · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 6:06 pm

Bi_3 wrote:

It’s not either or.

Of course it is. If his testimony is that he was lying before, than he's either lying then or he's lying now.

dimejinky99 · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am **Posts:** 35480

So he’s lied again today when he said he never wanted/was looking for a job in the WH

bune · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 6:10 pm

dimejinky99 · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am **Posts:** 35480

McParadigm wrote:

Has anybody actually **defended** the president yet? Did I miss that happening?

The online commentary to these things is always more enlightening than the proceedings

Fuzzy_Dunlop · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 10:45 pm **Posts:** 152

bune wrote:

Did he say he didn't want to win or that he didn't expect to win?

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 6:24 pm

Katie Hill. Attractive?

verb_to_trust · **Posted:** Wed February 27, 2019 6:25 pm

dimejinky99 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Has anybody actually **defended** the president yet? Did I miss that happening?

The online commentary to these things is always more enlightening than the proceedings

Bob Gibbs says: Hold my beer.

Peeps · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm **Posts:** 5825

Bi_3 · **Joined:** Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm **Posts:** 14254

Peeps wrote:

Korean prison?

McParadigm · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am **Posts:** 21836

Is John Sarbanes awake?

Superblood Wolfmoon · **Joined:** Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm **Posts:** 1847

Clay "Derp" Higgins of Louisiana:

"Sir where are dem dang ol' boxes of traysure, dem dang documents, and why haven't they been turned over to da authorateez??"

Cohen:

"These boxes were the ones taken by the FBI when they raided my law offices, that were then returned to me and put into storage."

Derp:

"SOMEONE NEEDS TO LET THE FBI KNOW ABOUT DEM BOXES NOW!!"

:shake:

The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Who is online