Thu July 23, 2020 12:08 am
Thu July 23, 2020 3:14 am
simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/local/gardner-staffer-ordered-crime-lab-to-reassemble-patricia-mccloskeys-gun/63-be112149-d06c-4f54-a225-6545e74b5c2d?__twitter_impression=true
Wed July 29, 2020 7:22 am
blueviper wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/local/gardner-staffer-ordered-crime-lab-to-reassemble-patricia-mccloskeys-gun/63-be112149-d06c-4f54-a225-6545e74b5c2d?__twitter_impression=true
It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
Wed July 29, 2020 7:26 am
Wed July 29, 2020 8:05 pm
Thu July 30, 2020 3:41 pm
simple schoolboy wrote:blueviper wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/local/gardner-staffer-ordered-crime-lab-to-reassemble-patricia-mccloskeys-gun/63-be112149-d06c-4f54-a225-6545e74b5c2d?__twitter_impression=true
It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
The list of officers thing sounds like it could be an unreliable witness list. Most localities maintain such a list of officers known to have lied under oath. Prosecutors won't call them as a result and may drop cases that they are integral to. Maybe the list you refer to is different, but the scenario I described occurs pretty much everywhere.
Tue August 04, 2020 5:37 am
blueviper wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:blueviper wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/local/gardner-staffer-ordered-crime-lab-to-reassemble-patricia-mccloskeys-gun/63-be112149-d06c-4f54-a225-6545e74b5c2d?__twitter_impression=true
It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
The list of officers thing sounds like it could be an unreliable witness list. Most localities maintain such a list of officers known to have lied under oath. Prosecutors won't call them as a result and may drop cases that they are integral to. Maybe the list you refer to is different, but the scenario I described occurs pretty much everywhere.
This makes sense.
Tue August 04, 2020 5:50 am
Mon August 10, 2020 5:16 am
Fri August 14, 2020 5:11 am
simple schoolboy wrote:I'm seeing 9mm thats 2-3 times the cost of the before times.
I'm also hearing folx doing mag dumps into (the hillside? the air?) on a nightly basis. Is this where the extra $600 in UI has been going?
Apparently all these new gun buyers settled on 9mm, 5.56mm, or 12 gauge. Stick with fudd calibers and things are mostly normal.
Fri August 14, 2020 6:38 pm
Fri August 14, 2020 11:21 pm
simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
Sat August 15, 2020 12:16 am
Electromatic wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
How can a magazine be unconstitutional?
If you want to amend the constitution or write a law stating that they are illegal cool. A part of a gun that holds rounds is not unconstitutional. Otherwise a trunk or a shopping cart might as well be unconstitutional.
Sat August 15, 2020 1:31 am
simple schoolboy wrote:Electromatic wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
How can a magazine be unconstitutional?
If you want to amend the constitution or write a law stating that they are illegal cool. A part of a gun that holds rounds is not unconstitutional. Otherwise a trunk or a shopping cart might as well be unconstitutional.
A ban on high capacity magazines is unconstitutional. Sorry if my terrible writing style obscured that.
Sat August 15, 2020 4:49 am
Sat August 15, 2020 5:58 am
Bammer wrote:What’s up guys a 5 year old got shot by his 25 year old neighbor.
Guns.
Cannon Hinnant
Sat August 15, 2020 6:02 am
simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
Thu August 20, 2020 9:11 pm
Sun August 23, 2020 5:00 am
Thu August 27, 2020 1:04 am