The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Wed August 26, 2015 10:42 pm
See you in another life, brother
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm Posts: 6652
turned2black wrote:
4/5 wrote:
Remember when this board used to have a strong libertarian, even anarchist, population for a while?
Libertarians tend to know their shit, so I'd guess the discussions were a lot better than they are now.
They were. Plus, it wasn't dominated by them; we had a really good mix of people who were reasonably informed and/or crazy but passionate from a range of ideologies.
I miss PunkDavid, thodoks, glorified_version, little wing, lysander, sun devil, buffalohed, and the others.
_________________ "I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Wed August 26, 2015 11:47 pm
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm Posts: 5825
4/5 wrote:
turned2black wrote:
4/5 wrote:
Remember when this board used to have a strong libertarian, even anarchist, population for a while?
Libertarians tend to know their shit, so I'd guess the discussions were a lot better than they are now.
They were. Plus, it wasn't dominated by them; we had a really good mix of people who were reasonably informed and/or crazy but passionate from a range of ideologies.
I miss PunkDavid, thodoks, glorified_version, little wing, lysander, sun devil, buffalohed, and the others.
Sun devil and I clashed a few times in the NBA threads. Suns fans love blaming the Spurs for their various playoff miseries.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Wed August 26, 2015 11:50 pm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am Posts: 21836
4/5 wrote:
turned2black wrote:
4/5 wrote:
Remember when this board used to have a strong libertarian, even anarchist, population for a while?
Libertarians tend to know their shit, so I'd guess the discussions were a lot better than they are now.
They were. Plus, it wasn't dominated by them; we had a really good mix of people who were reasonably informed and/or crazy but passionate from a range of ideologies.
I miss PunkDavid, thodoks, glorified_version, little wing, lysander, sun devil, buffalohed, and the others.
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 11:10 am
A Return To Form
Joined: Sun July 26, 2015 9:38 am Posts: 236
McParadigm wrote:
4/5 wrote:
turned2black wrote:
4/5 wrote:
Remember when this board used to have a strong libertarian, even anarchist, population for a while?
Libertarians tend to know their shit, so I'd guess the discussions were a lot better than they are now.
They were. Plus, it wasn't dominated by them; we had a really good mix of people who were reasonably informed and/or crazy but passionate from a range of ideologies.
I miss PunkDavid, thodoks, glorified_version, little wing, lysander, sun devil, buffalohed, and the others.
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
I did mean "pre-Franco" and I was wasted.
A compromise could be a socialist democracy, some of the European countries are sort of doing that. The motivation behind labor determines the attitude of the individual. Capitalism is all about the self, a selfish constant competition with your neighbors, co-workers, etc,.. yet the core motivation behind labor in a socialist state is to cooperate, work with your neighbor, coworker, to ultimately create a better place to live, a selfless ideology,. that would change "me" to "we". And for that change to happen, because without it the system won't work.....you just need a few charismatic people with that ideology...to get it going...and as people work within the system that crucial mentality is created. So you don't need to convert every before instigating a socialist structure, in time that mentality spreads.
What's good for the self, is good for the community, so, ultimately, you are still working with the intent to better your life for yourself and your family, there is that selfish motivation-because human beings are selfish retards, so it is not an unnatural society.
To achieve that....you need a gov't that fears its people, one that is as small as possible...not this monstrosity that has people afraid of it.
Neo Liberal bullshit. corporate welfare.
this sums it up, i just found it...
_________________ There's plenty for all.
We are an impossibility in an impossible universe.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 1:17 pm
The Master
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 31614 Location: Garbage Dump
What you're describing sounds like the opposite of anarchy or libertarianism, because I can't imagine a more selfish and cruel political ideology than those.
The only system of government that makes any sense to me is capitalism, but with a lot of socialist policies. Which means big government. It's unfortunate that we need it, but as you said, people are selfish assholes. Until people decide to be nice and caring all on their own, we're going to need programs in place to help those less fortunate. At the same time, I don't think you can have a free society in which people are not allowed to be selfish, so flat-out socialism and communism are out.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 3:43 pm
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm Posts: 5825
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Mon August 31, 2015 7:31 am
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am Posts: 5593
turned2black wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
I suppose one can envision a world where private landowners send out agents to choke the Eric Garners of the world to death, but it seems like a poor business model.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Mon August 31, 2015 4:01 pm
Troglodyte
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22531 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Redemption wrote:
Ashley Madison CEO and founder stepped down.
Bounty on hackers raised to $100,000
So, after creating a website that facilitated the cheating of millions of married people, this leak the the failing that has shamed him into retirement?
_________________ Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Mon August 31, 2015 4:02 pm
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm Posts: 47323
B wrote:
Redemption wrote:
Ashley Madison CEO and founder stepped down.
Bounty on hackers raised to $100,000
So, after creating a website that facilitated the cheating of millions of married people, this leak the the failing that has shamed him into retirement?
were you on the list, B?
_________________ Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Mon August 31, 2015 4:06 pm
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm Posts: 5825
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
I suppose one can envision a world where private landowners send out agents to choke the Eric Garners of the world to death, but it seems like a poor business model.
Because private landowners and their "business models" have such a good track record when it comes to human rights?
Again, I don't understand this misguided view that somehow a libertarian society would be devoid of power-hungry assholes.
Last edited by nyquillyn on Mon August 31, 2015 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Mon August 31, 2015 8:07 pm
Troglodyte
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22531 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
B wrote:
Redemption wrote:
Ashley Madison CEO and founder stepped down.
Bounty on hackers raised to $100,000
So, after creating a website that facilitated the cheating of millions of married people, this leak the the failing that has shamed him into retirement?
were you on the list, B?
I wasn't, but I need to check for my wife.
_________________ Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Tue September 01, 2015 3:29 am
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am Posts: 5593
turned2black wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
I suppose one can envision a world where private landowners send out agents to choke the Eric Garners of the world to death, but it seems like a poor business model.
Because private landowners and their "business models" have such a good track record when it comes to human rights?
Again, I don't understand this misguided view that somehow a libertarian society would be devoid of power-hungry assholes.
A libertarian society assumes nothing of the sort. It only assumes that power hungry assholes have to provide some sort of value and that generally you can avoid dealing with them. Additionally, attempting to separate said power hungry assholes from the judicial system is desirous, as opposed to aligning the interests of the power hungry to the judiciary as much as possible.
As it stands now, power hungry assholes are encouraged to sign up to carry guns and abuse others with political and legal protections. I don't recall seeing too many stories about the loss prevention guys at Wal-Mart beating someone to death. That could be because they know they don't have qualified immunity . It could also be because they didn't sign up for the position because they enjoy abusing people.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Tue September 01, 2015 4:35 am
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm Posts: 5825
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
I suppose one can envision a world where private landowners send out agents to choke the Eric Garners of the world to death, but it seems like a poor business model.
Because private landowners and their "business models" have such a good track record when it comes to human rights?
Again, I don't understand this misguided view that somehow a libertarian society would be devoid of power-hungry assholes.
A libertarian society assumes nothing of the sort. It only assumes that power hungry assholes have to provide some sort of value and that generally you can avoid dealing with them. Additionally, attempting to separate said power hungry assholes from the judicial system is desirous, as opposed to aligning the interests of the power hungry to the judiciary as much as possible.
As it stands now, power hungry assholes are encouraged to sign up to carry guns and abuse others with political and legal protections. I don't recall seeing too many stories about the loss prevention guys at Wal-Mart beating someone to death. That could be because they know they don't have qualified immunity . It could also be because they didn't sign up for the position because they enjoy abusing people.
Surely you're not comparing Wal-Mart's attempts to stop people from stealing Duck Dynasty bobbleheads to a city's attempts to police 8.5 million people.
Post subject: Re: Hacktivism-Ashley Madison Hacked
Posted: Tue September 01, 2015 5:05 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
turned2black wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
turned2black wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
At heart, libertarianism and government constructionism both rely on the existence (at reasonable frequency) of rational actors. Both are thus unavoidably stupid.
Agreed. They don't want a corrupt centralized government impeding on everyone's rights, but don't seem to understand that a private landowner will do the same if given the chance.
I suppose one can envision a world where private landowners send out agents to choke the Eric Garners of the world to death, but it seems like a poor business model.
Because private landowners and their "business models" have such a good track record when it comes to human rights?
Again, I don't understand this misguided view that somehow a libertarian society would be devoid of power-hungry assholes.
A libertarian society assumes nothing of the sort. It only assumes that power hungry assholes have to provide some sort of value and that generally you can avoid dealing with them. Additionally, attempting to separate said power hungry assholes from the judicial system is desirous, as opposed to aligning the interests of the power hungry to the judiciary as much as possible.
As it stands now, power hungry assholes are encouraged to sign up to carry guns and abuse others with political and legal protections. I don't recall seeing too many stories about the loss prevention guys at Wal-Mart beating someone to death. That could be because they know they don't have qualified immunity . It could also be because they didn't sign up for the position because they enjoy abusing people.
Surely you're not comparing Wal-Mart's attempts to stop people from stealing Duck Dynasty bobbleheads to a city's attempts to police 8.5 million people.
What else did you consider naming as the product besides Duck Dynasty bobbleheads?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum