Fri August 07, 2015 4:25 am
Fri August 07, 2015 4:42 am
Fri August 07, 2015 4:44 am
Fri August 07, 2015 4:47 am
Fri August 07, 2015 4:48 am
Fri August 07, 2015 4:52 am
Fri August 07, 2015 5:00 am
Fri August 07, 2015 5:05 am
Fri August 07, 2015 8:52 am
turned2black wrote:I always hated those fucking bears.
Fri August 07, 2015 1:27 pm
Oh man, I forgot to mention that I watched O'Reilly's show before the debates. That was quite the flashback. He ended the night with this oddball gen of a quote:BurtReynolds wrote:
Wed September 02, 2015 4:39 am
Wed September 02, 2015 5:13 pm
turned2black wrote:LOL.
Carbon dating suggests ‘world’s oldest’ Koran could be older than the Prophet Muhammad
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/carbon- ... -muhammad/
Wed September 02, 2015 9:37 pm
track11 wrote:turned2black wrote:LOL.
Carbon dating suggests ‘world’s oldest’ Koran could be older than the Prophet Muhammad
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/carbon- ... -muhammad/
LOL at the title, right?
"Carbon dating of a fragment from a Koran stored at a Birmingham library suggests that the book was produced between 568 and 645 A.D., said scientists at the University of Oxford..."
"Islamic scholars generally believe Muhammad lived between 570 and 632 A.D."
So, the REAL title of the article should be:
"Although we don't know muhammad's year of birth or death, carbon dating suggests the worlds oldest koran could have been produced before, during, or after muhammad's proposed life span."
Not quite the same ring, huh?
Wed September 02, 2015 10:54 pm
Wed September 02, 2015 11:00 pm
Wed September 02, 2015 11:02 pm
Wed September 02, 2015 11:05 pm
Wed September 02, 2015 11:14 pm
BurtReynolds wrote:wrong
Wed September 02, 2015 11:15 pm
Wed September 02, 2015 11:26 pm
BigRedLedbetter wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:wrong
This might actually be the right answer.