The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 31614 Location: Garbage Dump
Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. As soon as you started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying. This is basic stuff.
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm Posts: 558
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. The second you first started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying.
Russell's Teapot simply tries to illustrate that the fact that we can’t disprove something is a very poor reason to believe it. I don't believe in God because we can't disprove it. I believe in God because at this point in time, it's reasonable to, knowing that i could be wrong.
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 31614 Location: Garbage Dump
pnjguy wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. The second you first started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying.
Russell's Teapot simply tries to illustrate that the fact that we can’t disprove something is a very poor reason to believe it. I don't believe in God because we can't disprove it. I believe in God because at this point in time, it's reasonable to, knowing that i could be wrong.
I'd question what you define as "reasonable," but whatever floats your boat.
Also, I wasn't bringing up Russell's Teapot in response to your belief, but in response to every argument you posted.
So much for the idea that godless scientists can't be objective. The biggest finding to support inflation theory quickly demolished by two groups of scientists.
Evidence for Cosmic Inflation Theory Bites the (Space) Dust
So much for the idea that godless scientists can't be objective. The biggest finding to support inflation theory quickly demolished by two groups of scientists.
Evidence for Cosmic Inflation Theory Bites the (Space) Dust
Joined: Wed November 05, 2014 5:29 pm Posts: 453 Location: The ghost of Soma's fanny pack.
Guys, god still doesn't exist. Nothing has changed. It's 2015. There has never been a more ridiculous time to think otherwise.
_________________
bodysnatcher wrote:
All I know is that I messaged my wife earlier about this, and my iphone's autocorrect knew to put an é on the end of Beyoncé, and it changed "Beck" to "neck"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum