The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Thu January 03, 2013 8:33 pm
post-structuralist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
someone please explain in short and easy to understand words exactly what the purpose was of holding up the passage of this bill - I'm not inclined to follow along closely to the news reports on the whole process and ultimately feel most of the 'argument' was political posturing.
someone dissuade me or something, I'm dumb.
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Thu January 03, 2013 9:28 pm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm Posts: 24088 Location: almost in canada
malice wrote:
someone please explain in short and easy to understand words exactly what the purpose was of holding up the passage of this bill - I'm not inclined to follow along closely to the news reports on the whole process and ultimately feel most of the 'argument' was political posturing.
someone dissuade me or something, I'm dumb.
It's the deficit-reduction package that doesn't reduce the deficit. It's the debt-ceiling deal that doesn't touch the debt ceiling
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Fri January 04, 2013 4:08 am
The Master
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am Posts: 28173
malice wrote:
someone please explain in short and easy to understand words exactly what the purpose was of holding up the passage of this bill - I'm not inclined to follow along closely to the news reports on the whole process and ultimately feel most of the 'argument' was political posturing.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Fri January 04, 2013 4:43 am
A Return To Form
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 10:19 pm Posts: 173
Yes, the federal government is obscenely wasteful, hopelessly bloated, generally incompetent. It's the one thing that everyone who visits this page would agree on.
Yet many people are in favor of the tax hikes in the bill.
I will never understand, as long as I live, why so many people offer, insist, demand on giving this government more and more money.
2.5 trilliion in "revenue" last year...it's not enough, it's never enough.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Fri January 04, 2013 3:58 pm
Future Drummer
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm Posts: 2868 Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ
It pains me to defend the government, but like Stip said in the old thread, at some point we have to accept some blame ourselves for this mess. We want endless defense spending, huge social safety nets, an expansive role for federal government, and low taxes all at the same time and our elected officials are providing that for us. It's not indefintely sustainable, but we keep demanding it.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Fri January 04, 2013 5:12 pm
The worst
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm Posts: 39917
well the government does a lot of really important stuff. I take issue with MIB's post. Ask people on medicare, medicaid, unemployment insurance, social security, the students in my classroom who can afford college due to pell grants, the people who enjoy drinking clean water, the kids in head start programs, the people who work for health and human services, people doing research on diseases, people who enjoy going to national parks, people who drive on public highways, etc.
The government wastes money. The government spends money that provides important social services and stimulates economic growth. The important discussion is never 'should the government spend money.' it should always be 'should the government be spending THIS particular money on THIS particular service/program/tax incentive/etc. We'll have much better government if we stop turning it into a fight about whether or not government should exist and more about whether or a particular program can accomplish the end goals of that program more effectively than alternatives, or if this particular program is even worth having.
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Mon January 21, 2013 4:09 am
Troglodyte
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22548 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
More popular than Congress: Nickelback Traffic Jams NFL Replacement Refs Lice Donald Trump France Genghis Khan Root Canals cockroaches used car salesmen colonoscopies carnies Brussels sprouts
Less Popular than Congress telemarketers John Edwards Kardashians Lobbyists North Korea ebola Lindsay Lohan Fidel Castro pundits bullies Meth labs Communism The Clap
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Tue January 22, 2013 4:03 am
Misplaced My Sponge
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am Posts: 5598
Do I understand correctly that the democratic congressional leadership has threatened to actually propose a budget? Its funny that its a threat directed to republicans (who will then have to respond) when normally its an yearly obligation that the governing party has failed to do since... when exactly?
And what is the implied threat? The dems will *shudder* keep defense spending at current levels instead of an unstoppable upswing? What precisely are the Republicans pushing back at? Although the discretionary budget is filled with all sorts of questionable spending, its not a big item. No one seriously wants to address the deficit because it requires asking retirees to make do with less, and well we can't ask upper middle class Americans to get by without their welfare. Based on demographics, relatively few grandmas will have to survive on cat food without social security. We should probably reserve it for those who would and tell the others to make do with the 401ks and pensions that are far more generous than current workers can reasonably expect.
It doesn't at all seem unecessarily complicated that the budget be determined in one set of legislation and borrowing in another. If they were coupled together we would both lose the pageantry and well, they'd jack up borrowing when no one was paying attention. Balanced budgets, how do they work!?
Post subject: Re: Federal Sequestration/Fiscal Cliff - Part II
Posted: Thu February 28, 2013 7:45 pm
Broken Tamborine
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 2:59 am Posts: 275
I'd be more worried about this if every politician out there were saying "will, would" instead of "might, may, could" when talking about the effects of these budget "cuts".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum