The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Production Police
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 47166
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
warehouse wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
my big hangup with all this dumb legalization is that for some of these states it's literally the best economic plan they can come up with. Accelerated virtual degrees ltowards a living wage? Nah, let's just let the low-income people get stoned more easily and put the taxes towards tax rebates.

why is it dumb? b/c there are other ways to generate tax revenue? i would say generating tax revenue while also correcting ridiculously out of date marijuana laws is the opposite of dumb.

Because the blanket legalization without any sort of real enforcement of safe driving, access for minors, operation of heavy equipment, etc. is not prudent. I'm all for "correcting ridiculously out of date marijuana laws," but there's a big gap between decriminalization and open-door legalization that hasn't been enacted anywhere in the US, to the best of my knowledge (setting aside medical use programs.)


warehouse wrote:
and your perception of who's buying legal marijuana archaic, legal marijuana isn't cheap. fentanyl, however, is.

I didn't say anything about this, but while we're on the subject, you can buy an ounce for $80 in CA now. That's pretty fuckin' cheap.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:08 pm 
Offline
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Posts: 4363
tragabigzanda wrote:
warehouse wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
my big hangup with all this dumb legalization is that for some of these states it's literally the best economic plan they can come up with. Accelerated virtual degrees ltowards a living wage? Nah, let's just let the low-income people get stoned more easily and put the taxes towards tax rebates.

why is it dumb? b/c there are other ways to generate tax revenue? i would say generating tax revenue while also correcting ridiculously out of date marijuana laws is the opposite of dumb.

Because the blanket legalization without any sort of real enforcement of safe driving, access for minors, operation of heavy equipment, etc. is not prudent. I'm all for "correcting ridiculously out of date marijuana laws," but there's a big gap between decriminalization and open-door legalization that hasn't been enacted anywhere in the US, to the best of my knowledge (setting aside medical use programs.)

every state that has legal marijuana has age restrictions. I agree there needs to be a better way to test people driving under the influence, but again, we need to be able to study it w/o it being a schedule 1 drug



tragabigzanda wrote:
warehouse wrote:
and your perception of who's buying legal marijuana archaic, legal marijuana isn't cheap. fentanyl, however, is.

I didn't say anything about this, but while we're on the subject, you can buy an ounce for $80 in CA now. That's pretty fuckin' cheap.


this you?

tragabigzanda wrote:
Accelerated virtual degrees ltowards a living wage? Nah, let's just let the low-income people get stoned more easily and put the taxes towards tax rebates.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Production Police
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 47166
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Yes fentanyl is cheaper than marijuana.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:26 pm 
Offline
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Posts: 4363
my point is legalization isn't "dumb", and most of the reasons you think it is are addressed during the legalization process. the only solution to any of this is to declassify it federally. in fact the whole scheduling of drugs should be changed

Quote:
Schedule I

Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote.

Schedule II

Schedule II drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence. These drugs are also considered dangerous. Some examples of Schedule II drugs are: combination products with less than 15 milligrams of hydrocodone per dosage unit (Vicodin), cocaine, methamphetamine, methadone, hydromorphone (Dilaudid), meperidine (Demerol), oxycodone (OxyContin), fentanyl, Dexedrine, Adderall, and Ritalin


OxyContin has done more harm to the country than any of the other drugs listed here, wtf are we doing?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Production Police
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 47166
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
i agree it should be studied. The most important issues around legalization of marijuana have not been effectively addresses throughout the legalization process, as best as I can tell. Excited to see some new impairment devices come to market though.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:30 pm 
Offline
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Sat August 05, 2023 11:13 pm
Posts: 2577
tragabigzanda wrote:
i agree it should be studied. The most important issues around legalization of marijuana have not been effectively addresses throughout the legalization process, as best as I can tell. Excited to see some new impairment devices come to market though.



That excites you?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Production Police
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 47166
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
tommy wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
i agree it should be studied. The most important issues around legalization of marijuana have not been effectively addresses throughout the legalization process, as best as I can tell. Excited to see some new impairment devices come to market though.



That excites you?

sorry, impairment detection


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:35 pm 
Offline
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Posts: 4363
tragabigzanda wrote:
tommy wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
i agree it should be studied. The most important issues around legalization of marijuana have not been effectively addresses throughout the legalization process, as best as I can tell. Excited to see some new impairment devices come to market though.



That excites you?

sorry, impairment detection

:lol: WHOOPS!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Cannabis
PostPosted: Tue August 22, 2023 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Looks Like a Cat
 Profile

Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Posts: 14268
tragabigzanda wrote:
i agree it should be studied. The most important issues around legalization of marijuana have not been effectively addresses throughout the legalization process, as best as I can tell. Excited to see some new impairment devices come to market though.



Agree. I also think there is sometimes push back from those who see criticism of current legalization laws as indirectly advocating for re-criminalization, which it is not.

_________________
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sat April 27, 2024 8:48 am