Switch to full style
Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post a reply

Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 5:57 am

I can't

But maybe you can

Imagine the United States filled with a shitload of unwanted children (not you, illegal immigrants) . No seriously , not to be a dick but aren't abortions unwanted children.yes/no?


Doesn't matter, either way. you'll just have to just sit there right and wait until you are 18

. Then YeS, yee will have easy answer access to AR-15s and other Cuntosaurus rifles to kill all the special ones that have moms and dads that love them and wanted them in the first place.

Holy Ghost indeed amen

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 6:05 am

u2)

Can't believe this is real. But since it is,

Let's just make the living room floor a gigantic mattress to have and hold all the babies.

Let's put all the responsibility on you guys to water the babies lol

Doesn't matter if you water the floor or forget to water the also donated bird bath which also holds tsunami babies , either way men you're not gonna remember to water anything at all , . So let all just shrivel up and die now while we're ahead

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 12:26 pm

Mornin', Tunes, how're things?

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 2:30 pm

Wow.

I thought I'd have to wake up and delete what I posted last night.

Not at all!
:bammer:

'morning, amos!

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 2:43 pm

:hooray:

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 2:46 pm

Are the babies free? Can I take as many as I want? I need soldiers for my army.

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 3:11 pm

BurtReynolds wrote:Are the babies free? Can I take as many as I want? I need soldiers for my army.


child please. they are all yours. just be sure to arm and water them properly!

Spoiler: show
Image

Re: Abortion

Sun June 26, 2022 10:46 pm

Just wondering... is anyone here legit pro-life? Like no abortions in any circumstance?

Re: Abortion

Mon June 27, 2022 11:28 am

And to try and push this thread since modding appears to be a historical anomaly, here's WaPo on the oft cited RBG quotes:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/abortion-roe-v-wade-ruth-bader-ginsburg/2021/08/06/e5156ed2-f6bc-11eb-9068-bf463c8c74de_story.html

Ginsburg disagreed with the Roe majority’s foundational finding that the right to abortion was based on the privacy of a woman’s decisionmaking with her doctor. Additionally, she felt the court went too far in 1973 in setting standards for the entire country, rather than simply striking down a Texas law she said “intolerably shackled a woman’s autonomy.”

She blamed the court’s “breathtaking” decision for short-circuiting the debate about abortion rights, which she believed would have evolved into protection for abortion rights by the political branches.


“My idea of how choice should have developed was not a privacy notion, not a doctor’s right notion, but a woman’s right to control her own destiny, to be able to make choices without a Big Brother state telling her what she can and cannot do,” she said.



This seems like the avenue that was used to break Roe, a roundabout victory through an attack the faults in the decision not concept of abortion.
Post a reply