Mon June 10, 2019 6:26 am
verb_to_trust wrote:Where's Yang?
Mon June 10, 2019 6:13 pm
Tue June 11, 2019 7:37 pm
Wed June 12, 2019 12:01 pm
Wed June 12, 2019 4:26 pm
Mickey wrote:Here are the raw numbers for Trump in the states that are expected to be competitive in the 2020 election:
New Hampshire: 39 percent approval, 58 percent disapproval
Wisconsin: 42 percent approval, 55 percent disapproval
Michigan: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
Iowa: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
Arizona: 45 percent approval, 51 percent disapproval
Pennsylvania 45 percent approval, 52 percent disapproval
Ohio: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
North Carolina: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
Florida: 48 percent approval, 48 percent disapproval
Indiana: 49 percent approval, 46 percent disapproval
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/6/5/18653800/trump-approval-rating-by-state-2020-election-odds
Wed June 12, 2019 8:19 pm
Wed June 12, 2019 11:43 pm
Thu June 13, 2019 6:49 pm
Thu June 13, 2019 6:57 pm
Green Habit wrote:I want to rant about some on the left who are railing against some of the Democratic presidential candidates' refusal to instead run for the Senate:
1. While I think there's some truth that Democrats might have more difficulty winning Senate seats these days, I think many overstate that difficulty, and successfully winning the presidency should have long enough coat tails to carry over an unexpected Senate seat win or two here or there.
2. If these candidates don't want to run the Senate, then why would you want them to run? Wouldn't you rather run someone who is fully devoted to winning that race?
3. And why assume that these candidates are the only ones capable of winning Senate seats, or that they're the best ones? Maybe their refusal to run will open up opportunity for better candidates. (As a corollary to this point, there's particular complaint about how many of them are white men. Perhaps the white men, under the notion that they overestimate their capability, will do so here and clear the way for those who aren't white men to run for the Senate.)
4. And some of these candidates may still run for the Senate after their presidential campaigns crash and burn. Remember Marco Rubio from 2016?
Thu June 13, 2019 7:11 pm
Steve Bullock got beat up substantially on Twitter over this tweet, with at least three quarters of the replies ordering him to run for Senate. (Wouldn't mind hearing trag's take on this since it's Montana.) Hickenlooper gets this a lot too. I would agree that the criticism is best lobbied against Beto.Mickey wrote:I haven't seen this directed at anyone other than Beto, which I think is legitimate.
Thu June 13, 2019 10:56 pm
Thu June 13, 2019 11:36 pm
Fri June 14, 2019 12:05 am
Fri June 14, 2019 12:17 am
cutuphalfdead wrote:10 per night means there's exactly the same amount of people on stage as the first GOP debate in 2016.
Fri June 14, 2019 12:21 am
Fri June 14, 2019 12:22 am
Bi_3 wrote:Can we pass a law that says no one can run for public office more than a year before the election date?
Fri June 14, 2019 12:36 am
BurtReynolds wrote:
this promises to be an absolute shitshow.
Sun June 23, 2019 8:45 pm
Sun June 23, 2019 9:13 pm
Mon June 24, 2019 12:02 am