The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
It's awesome if this is her finding her true self and leads to a happier, more fulfilled life.
This. It’s also kinda awesome that we are at the point where this isn’t career suicide.
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
The Elliott Page news is pretty awesome. At the risk of sounding like a shithead, I can't immediately think of any trans celebrities whose fame wasn't somehow defined by their being trans (I'm sure they exist, I just can't think of any).
Page is obviously talented as hell, and he made his career on his own merits. I'd like to think that his coming out after achieving a ton of success will help move the rock up the hill just a little bit more than had it been the other way around.
I thought Elliot's choice of he/they rather than he/his pronouns to be weird. I wonder if that is tied to losing his previous identity of lesbian, or desire to belong in the queer community. I have mad respect for anyone courageous enough to transition, but I find the psychology post transition fascinating.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20858 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I think the bigger question is 'can kids really consent to puberty blockers?'
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20858 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Bi_3 wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I think the bigger question is 'can kids really consent to puberty blockers?'
I haven’t heard of those procedures before and my initial reaction is that it’s a mix between playing God, and taking steroids.
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I think Gabbard's take is correct. There are structural differences that provide males some advantages in sports even if muscle mass is the same as a female.
My take would be make all sports co-ed. We don't or shouldn't discriminate in the workplace, why should the sports workplace be any different.
_________________ Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am Posts: 20858 Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
surfndestroy wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
Bammer wrote:
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I think Gabbard's take is correct. There are structural differences that provide males some advantages in sports even if muscle mass is the same as a female.
My take would be make all sports co-ed. We don't or shouldn't discriminate in the workplace, why should the sports workplace be any different.
I'm on board with this. There is one team, everybody goes through the same tryouts. May the best they win. Equality FTW.
I heard on the radio today that on her way out of congress, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill that would ban people who were biologically born male from competing in women’s sports.
Discuss.
I'm confused as to how this falls under federal purview. Is this specific to institutions that receive Department of Education funding?
Trans rights activists objections notwithstanding, if policy has to be made with broad strokes (and it is when Federally mandated), transwomen will have an advantage unless they take puberty blockers early on, which has other issues and probably should not be encouraged as a pre-requisite for playing sports.
So yeah, they either have some advantage that cannot be corrected by a few years of cross sex hormones, or they have potentially stunted growth and/ or bird bones.
Did they ever do a study on transwomen and bone density? My understanding is that preventing a normalish puberty in transwomen makes certain surgical interventions difficult later on. Are puberty blockers less likely to be used in transwomen?
I think Gabbard's take is correct. There are structural differences that provide males some advantages in sports even if muscle mass is the same as a female.
My take would be make all sports co-ed. We don't or shouldn't discriminate in the workplace, why should the sports workplace be any different.
I'm on board with this. There is one team, everybody goes through the same tryouts. May the best they win. Equality FTW.
When has that ever been the way it works in this country? Teams will just fall all over themselves to score woke points by being the first to add some slow twitch pear of a female to their rosters.
I haven’t heard of those procedures before and my initial reaction is that it’s a mix between playing God, and taking steroids.
You just described modern medicine
If its for off label use, sure. Dr's basically going YOLO.
If these were new drugs there'd have to be proper trials dragging out for a decade or so.
If you feel that applying previously-trialed, well-understood medications to new therapy programs is an unethical standard for modern medicine, you should make a thread about it because it is the norm and has impacted everything from premie care to lasik surgery to the president’s COVID treatment.
I haven’t heard of those procedures before and my initial reaction is that it’s a mix between playing God, and taking steroids.
You just described modern medicine
If its for off label use, sure. Dr's basically going YOLO.
If these were new drugs there'd have to be proper trials dragging out for a decade or so.
If you feel that applying previously-trialed, well-understood medications to new therapy programs is an unethical standard for modern medicine, you should make a thread about it because it is the norm and has impacted everything from premie care to lasik surgery to the president’s COVID treatment.
Nothing wrong with off label use. As you previously indicated, modern medicine doesn't work without it. Practice of Medicine =/ Science.
There are plenty of unanswered questions regarding long term use of these drugs.
Will the tradeoff be worth it for some patients? Sure! Are they getting all the information they need for informed consent? I hope so. Lets hope the Drs involved are more informed and ethical than the Trans Rights Activists that keep on claiming that puberty blockers are reversible.
Users browsing this forum: Rangi Guy and 36 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum