Andy NGO videos? Gross, let's get some different vibes in here

Fretting about the slippery slope of doxing people for bad behavior in one thread and sharing videos by someone best known for doxxing people in order to produce harassment campaigns and for getting caught editing footage to misrepresent, in another. But this time it supports my priors so

There is a difference between posting mugshots (public records) and posting an at-the-time uncharged person's name and address. But hey, Tucker, right?

I have a really hard time following mcp's posts when he doesn't imbed a tweet to accompany whatever point he is making.

He’s read the studies and he expects that you have, too?

No, that's spike

Hmm interesting mugshot you got there, looks a lot like a cellphone video of a private citizen with their full name attached

Private citizen in public with no expectation of privacy. Not sure how he got her name, but he's not posting addressess.

Maybe people shouldn't have an expectation thay their names be held in confidence when they engage in violent acts?

Mickey, your approach here is worse than B wanting boys to shower with his daughter after their junior high soccer game.

Sorey B, couldn’t help myself. I know that’s not entirely accurate.

I have no idea what that means and I'd like to keep it that way.

Damn maybe so, really makes you think huh.

This could, but probably won't be, a uniting moment on RM.

RM N&D I should say...

I completely agree he should not have done that. What's your point?

Something about ethos and credibility. I'll let McP speak for himself though.

Of what?

I appreciate the silent acknowledgement that the account you are currently sharing videos from in this thread has indeed been repeatedly caught editing videos to misrepresent events.


That it's exactly the type of behavior being attributed to him above, which you reframed as "posting mugshots?" That if you fret about doxxing in one instance, then maybe wait more than a day before sharing videos by a guy who makes his living misframing events and naming names in another because it fits the narrative you believe in?


Anyways, a show on a news platform with 4 and a half million nightly viewers has spent the last few weeks spouting vaccine skepticism talking points. I'm sorry I upset you by mentioning it in a conversation about vaccine skepticism, such that you needed to carry your condescension over several days and into this conversation.

Does Ngo sometimes clip videos and generally present a biased view? Of course he does.

He also is a great source for videos of Antifa/blm being dogshit human beings and pissing off Mickey and McP.

One doesn't cancel out the other.

Are you saying he edited the video of the black guy yelling somehow? Or are you suggesting that the video in-question that he posted, which he did not film, was edited by someone else? Or that other videos have been edited in the past, therefore this one must have been? Do you have examples of these edited video so I can understand? Are you suggesting that standard be applied to all news sources? I'm still not following this line of thinking and don't want to be perpetuating false info, so please help me understand.

edit: I would point out that the video does not contain anyone's name


Here's where I got the mugshot info from, when you said doxxing I assumed you were referring to this behavior, not some two year old tweet:

https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/09/16/p ... r-account/