The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Why would this decision not also apply to private individuals live streaming? No expectation of privacy in public, so why does it matter who is livestreaming?
It's the easiest way to reduce crime: eliminate evidence it ever happened
This seems like a mistake. I mean, it's distinctly different than police usage of "Ring" units in neighborhoods, which is what I'm thinking is the parrellel the ACLU is drawing.
Didnt the ACLU recently say they were putting antiracism over civil liberties? Something like they would no longer defend hate speech?
I honestly don’t know if they did. Google it and let us know.
In the meantime, I’m unclear why the distinction between “a government enforcement agency should be documenting its behaviors during protests for accountability purposes,” and “that agency shouldn’t be live streaming footage in real time” is at all complex.
In the meantime, I’m unclear why the distinction between “a government enforcement agency should be documenting its behaviors during protests for accountability purposes,” and “that footage shouldn’t be live-streamed in real time” is at all complex.
Me too. Both should mandated to ensure honest and complete disclosure to the public. We cannot continue to allow selective edits on socials to be used to manipulate public opinion, so live streams are a good solution that allow independent sources to hold both officer and civilian accountable for their behaviors.
_________________
Norris wrote:
lol bi is a piece of shit human being and anyone who engages him in conversation is wasting their time
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am Posts: 6341 Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Livestreaming is the key phrase. I got it now. Missed that distinction before.
Innocent until proven guilty should be maintained. Video could always be evidence (for either party). As opposed "to guilty because I saw you in the crowd during an active live stream." Makes much more sense to me now.
Do not accept an object from a stranger in a crowd under the assurance that it is a 'firework' and then ignite said object and throw it at a federal building.
Whatever ATF or FBI agent that was is probably in line for a promotion.
Also, if accurate, he "turned himself into his PO" (parole officer?). So, violated in the local system, and now serious federal time. His prefontal cortex will be fully developed by the time he gets out, so maybe he can be a productive member of society when he's 30 something.
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm Posts: 45557 Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Probably just moles in the chats. I think Telegram is pretty secure. But who knows. The Deep State is probably trying out all sorts of new toys on the rioters.
_________________ Fundamentally, my position is one of harm reduction.
Probably just moles in the chats. I think Telegram is pretty secure. But who knows. The Deep State is probably trying out all sorts of new toys on the rioters.
I'm sure all state and local stingrays were hoovering all text messages and call logs up.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 21856
elliseamos wrote:
Livestreaming is the key phrase. I got it now. Missed that distinction before.
Innocent until proven guilty should be maintained. Video could always be evidence (for either party). As opposed "to guilty because I saw you in the crowd during an active live stream." Makes much more sense to me now.
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 21856
BurtReynolds wrote:
Pretty smart using horses. Bigger than bikes, but don't have the stigma of driving through crowds in a vehicle. Plus, who wants to hurt a horse?
so true
the protestors wouldn't set a horse on fire
and the horses have more discipline than the protestors when it comes to non-violent confrontation
like planting a calm, experienced bouncer in front of a way-too-drunk prom queen
she can throw a few punches at him but his belly will just absorb them like a memory foam pillow while he smiles
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am Posts: 6341 Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
96583UP wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
Livestreaming is the key phrase. I got it now. Missed that distinction before.
Innocent until proven guilty should be maintained. Video could always be evidence (for either party). As opposed "to guilty because I saw you in the crowd during an active live stream." Makes much more sense to me now.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 21856
elliseamos wrote:
96583UP wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Pretty smart using horses. Bigger than bikes, but don't have the stigma of driving through crowds in a vehicle. Plus, who wants to hurt a horse?
so true
the protestors wouldn't set a horse on fire
and the horses have more discipline than the protestors when it comes to non-violent confrontation
like planting a calm, experienced bouncer in front of a way-too-drunk prom queen
she can throw a few punches at him but his belly will just absorb them like a memory foam pillow while he smiles
I wouldn't want to be around when the rider peppersprays his own horse though.
the horses usually have eye protectors
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
