Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

Women's Health Issues
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1515		 Page 30 of 30
Author:  B [ Mon December 11, 2023 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women's Health Issues
It's hard to imagine Texas giving fuck all about anyone's HIPAA rights ... in their state or any other.
Author:  Bi_3 [ Mon December 11, 2023 9:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women's Health Issues
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/11/us/texas-woman-leaves-state-abortion/index.html

I guess we're about to see how legal the Texas abortion prosecution laws really are. Hopefully she'll go to Canada so they can't prosecute any doctors that help her, but it is pretty clear they will prosecute her for the abortion once she returns to Texas. Imagine having to get a politician's permission to have a procedure. And this is a woman who wants to have kids.


Pretty fucked up. Maybe this is the case that forces the Supremes to deal with it?
Author:  B [ Mon December 11, 2023 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women's Health Issues
Bi_3 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/11/us/texas-woman-leaves-state-abortion/index.html

I guess we're about to see how legal the Texas abortion prosecution laws really are. Hopefully she'll go to Canada so they can't prosecute any doctors that help her, but it is pretty clear they will prosecute her for the abortion once she returns to Texas. Imagine having to get a politician's permission to have a procedure. And this is a woman who wants to have kids.


Pretty fucked up. Maybe this is the case that forces the Supremes to deal with it?


I'm not sure that will lead to less "fucked up" situations.
Author:  Bi_3 [ Mon December 11, 2023 9:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women's Health Issues
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/11/us/texas-woman-leaves-state-abortion/index.html

I guess we're about to see how legal the Texas abortion prosecution laws really are. Hopefully she'll go to Canada so they can't prosecute any doctors that help her, but it is pretty clear they will prosecute her for the abortion once she returns to Texas. Imagine having to get a politician's permission to have a procedure. And this is a woman who wants to have kids.


Pretty fucked up. Maybe this is the case that forces the Supremes to deal with it?


I'm not sure that will lead to less "fucked up" situations.


I’m assuming they would strike the portion of the Texas law that says Texas can prosecute for actions taken in another state where those same actions are legal. Otherwise it would create worse legal chaos as like California could pass a law that says obeying the Texas abortion reporting laws are felonies in California. And then back and forth forever.
Page 30 of 30 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/