The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22487 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Given that Wendy Davis had to talk for 11 hours to filibuster a law that would limit clinics offering abortions in Texas to 6, it's time to bring back this thread!
Senate Bill 307 protects men by requiring the following prior to receiving a prescription to treatment for erectile dysfunction:
- a signed affadavit from at least one sex partner confirming the man has indeed experienced the symptoms of impotence in the past 90 days - a psychological screening to ensure the condition is, in fact, medical in nature - ongoing cardiac stress tests and outpatient counseling about potential side effects - information from the prescribing physician about risks, complications as well as non-medical options including counseling and celibacy - copy of medical rationale for treatment filed in patient’s medical record
Quote:
When a man makes a crucial decision about his health and his body, he should be fully aware of the alternative options and the lifetime repercussions of that decision,” Senator Turner said today. Men will be more easily guided through the process of obtaining treatment for impotence so they can better understand and more effectively address their condition.
_________________ Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
malice wrote:
:roll:
To the NRA or the ED?
it was my first reaction to the ridiculous correlation of the 'abortion rights community' (whatever that is) to the NRA - it's not even vaguely accurate. the NRA has most of the republican party in its hip pocket for one thing (think election 'donations' and gifts from lobbyists) - and while a good portion of the democratic party (I think, although whatever) probably supports the idea that a woman's body and what gets done to it isn't the government's business, not to mention the obstruction of safe and clean medical treatment for women who opt to get an abortion is downright despicable... I'd hardly put anyone who is pro-choice (not pro-abortion, btw, just to make the distinction) in the same arena as the NRA. it's a deliberate inflammatory statement meant to elicit a response and I'm all about giving people what they want.
and since I'm on the subject and posting about it, I'd like to put forth a question to anyone interested in responding - what the hell has happened over the last couple decades, anyway?
at what point did the idea that it's ok to disparage women or people who are of the above stated opinion about women and our legal ability to choose when and how and why they have children become acceptable again?
- after so much shit and strife had to occur for what amounts to thousands of years of women either dealing with unwanted pregnancies, or unsafe methods (eg - hangers, anyone?) for ending an unwanted pregnancy; after establishing the legality of abortion - how in the world is it now possible that the country is moving backwards again towards making abortions illegal?
truly, I'm baffled by this, and disappointed (at the very least) - I'm also, sorry to say, worried. how does this bode for young women today and into the future? I don't get it.
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:23 pm Posts: 269 Location: By The Sea.
Quote:
and since I'm on the subject and posting about it, I'd like to put forth a question to anyone interested in responding - what the hell has happened over the last couple decades, anyway?
at what point did the idea that it's ok to disparage women or people who are of the above stated opinion about women and our legal ability to choose when and how and why they have children become acceptable again?
- after so much shit and strife had to occur for what amounts to thousands of years of women either dealing with unwanted pregnancies, or unsafe methods (eg - hangers, anyone?) for ending an unwanted pregnancy; after establishing the legality of abortion - how in the world is it now possible that the country is moving backwards again towards making abortions illegal?
truly, I'm baffled by this, and disappointed (at the very least) - I'm also, sorry to say, worried. how does this bode for young women today and into the future? I don't get it.
There is no like button here, so I'm quoting this and saying
_________________
Strat wrote:
I trust no one who thinks parachutes is a terrible song.
Things didn't become instantly easier when women were given the right the vote. Things also didn't become instantly easier when our grandmother's decided to ban the bra, or whatever the war cry was back then. I feel that we still have things to put our foot down on and we will always have things we will have to put our foot down on.
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm so into everything mary malice it's sickening.
You really have to stop stealing her clothes though, Chud.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
mookie wrote:
Things didn't become instantly easier when women were given the right the vote. Things also didn't become instantly easier when our grandmother's decided to ban the bra, or whatever the war cry was back then. I feel that we still have things to put our foot down on and we will always have things we will have to put our foot down on.
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm so into everything mary malice it's sickening.
You really have to stop stealing her clothes though, Chud.
Speaking of women's health issues, I forgot to mention that Shirley Dobson graced our presence today at work.
Her hubby was trying to call her on her cellphone, and she started fumbling and getting all uptight and had to excuse herself from my help at the counter because "you have to call the husband right back because you can't keep the husband waitin..."
Last edited by mookie on Sat June 29, 2013 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Things didn't become instantly easier when women were given the right the vote. Things also didn't become instantly easier when our grandmother's decided to ban the bra, or whatever the war cry was back then. I feel that we still have things to put our foot down on and we will always have things we will have to put our foot down on.
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm so into everything mary malice it's sickening.
You really have to stop stealing her clothes though, Chud.
it was my first reaction to the ridiculous correlation of the 'abortion rights community' (whatever that is) to the NRA - it's not even vaguely accurate. the NRA has most of the republican party in its hip pocket for one thing (think election 'donations' and gifts from lobbyists) - and while a good portion of the democratic party (I think, although whatever) probably supports the idea that a woman's body and what gets done to it isn't the government's business, not to mention the obstruction of safe and clean medical treatment for women who opt to get an abortion is downright despicable... I'd hardly put anyone who is pro-choice (not pro-abortion, btw, just to make the distinction) in the same arena as the NRA. it's a deliberate inflammatory statement meant to elicit a response and I'm all about giving people what they want.
and since I'm on the subject and posting about it, I'd like to put forth a question to anyone interested in responding - what the hell has happened over the last couple decades, anyway?
at what point did the idea that it's ok to disparage women or people who are of the above stated opinion about women and our legal ability to choose when and how and why they have children become acceptable again?
- after so much shit and strife had to occur for what amounts to thousands of years of women either dealing with unwanted pregnancies, or unsafe methods (eg - hangers, anyone?) for ending an unwanted pregnancy; after establishing the legality of abortion - how in the world is it now possible that the country is moving backwards again towards making abortions illegal?
truly, I'm baffled by this, and disappointed (at the very least) - I'm also, sorry to say, worried. how does this bode for young women today and into the future? I don't get it.
Do I have to post that picture of an 18 week old fetus again?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
Man in Black wrote:
malice wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
malice wrote:
:roll:
To the NRA or the ED?
blah blah blah, etc.
Do I have to post that picture of an 18 week old fetus again?
I wish you wouldn't. although I admit, I don't know what point it would make. something about if it looks like a human baby it's a crime against god to forcibly remove it from a womb? if so, I can only renew my stance that termination of a pregnancy is a moral judgement that an individual woman has to make, not a legal one that the government gets to make...
unless I misunderstand?
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm Posts: 4377 Location: faked by jorge
Harry Lime wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
I'm so into everything mary malice it's sickening.
Why don't you send her over a picture of your johnson, Favre.
two reasons, really: 1) I don't have a smart phone and so any effort pete makes in sending it over to me will fail miserably
2) I could just go see it in person if I was so inclined. although pete's a pretty good guy and not the sort to whip it out for some past middle aged woman who he's met on a couple of casual occasions...
_________________
Dev wrote:
you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
there's something utterly hypocritical, illogical and dangerously manichean in so-called "pro-life" people. i hate them. i wish they'd been born and raised in an over-populated, poor area of the world, with aids. see ya
Until you see the bill Kasich is about to sign into law that rivals what Texas is trying to do.
What bothers me about this issue is the fact that these guys don't want to support funding for contraception or sex education either. You'd think that would help reduce abortions more than passing a law that has a good chance of leading to more children in poverty that the state has to pay for. You know, the ones they're always complaining about.
They don't care about "protecting the unborn", they just want to control women.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum