Tue June 05, 2018 2:39 am
Simple Torture wrote:96583UP wrote:it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
So in Obama's America, a 3/10?
Thu June 21, 2018 2:56 pm
Fri June 22, 2018 12:54 am
Green Habit wrote:Get ready to pay sales tax on more online purchases.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 4_j4el.pdf
Mon June 25, 2018 5:50 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 2:31 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 3:18 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 3:45 pm
Kennedy's concurrence is a real WTF.McParadigm wrote:Partyline vote gives the travel ban a Supreme Court victory.
Tue June 26, 2018 3:47 pm
Disappointing. Between this and the travel ban case Kennedy's really being cowardly to end this term.Bi_3 wrote:What’s your take on the gerrymandering decision?Green Habit wrote:Get ready to pay sales tax on more online purchases.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 4_j4el.pdf
Tue June 26, 2018 3:57 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 4:07 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 4:09 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 4:12 pm
Several others have been speculating that. Reasonable guess, but only Kennedy himself knows.digster wrote:Although that doesn't really seem like someone who would want to retire with Trump choosing his replacement.
Tue June 26, 2018 4:22 pm
Tue June 26, 2018 4:28 pm
Correct.digster wrote:Also, there is zero mechanism for Democrats to pull a Garland until 2020, correct? If they win the House (which seems more likely) but don't win the Senate (which seems more likely), Democrats will still be out in the cold until Trump is voted out or they turn the Senate two years later. The House isn't involved in Supreme Court nominations at all, correct?
Wed June 27, 2018 12:48 am
Wed June 27, 2018 2:07 pm
Wed June 27, 2018 3:44 pm
Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may this, but this gets a huge from me.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
Wed June 27, 2018 6:08 pm
Wed June 27, 2018 6:08 pm
B wrote:Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may this, but this gets a huge from me.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.
Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
Wed June 27, 2018 6:16 pm
Bingo.@SkitchP wrote:That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.B wrote:Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may this, but this gets a huge from me.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.
Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.