Red Mosquito :: View topic - The Supreme Court

It's funny watching Bill Kristol suddenly turn against overturning Roe after decades of limp-dicked writing saying it should be overturned. What a shocking surprise!

Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."

Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html

B wrote:

Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html

Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?

Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf

Held: Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause.

Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.

Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?

Green Habit wrote:

Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.

4/5 wrote:

Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?

Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.

simple schoolboy wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.

I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.

Author:	Rob [ Tue May 10, 2022 1:36 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
BurtReynolds wrote: It's funny watching Bill Kristol suddenly turn against overturning Roe after decades of limp-dicked writing saying it should be overturned. What a shocking surprise! I’ve also noticed this. He’s the anti-trump republican who gets too into the identity. JD Vance is going the opposite way.

Author:	BurtReynolds [ Tue May 10, 2022 1:54 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
He's an actor paid to represent the Republican party (poorly) to liberals, and that was always his only job. He's the reason why the term RINO was invented.

Author:	BurtReynolds [ Tue May 10, 2022 1:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."

Author:	simple schoolboy [ Tue May 10, 2022 2:43 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
BurtReynolds wrote: Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries." Many such cases.

Author:	simple schoolboy [ Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Not SCOTUS, but 5th circuit: I hope the courts continue to dismantle the administrative state. Hopefully they do the ATF next.

Red Mosquito http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

The Supreme Court http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15	Page 167 of 192

Author:	simple schoolboy [ Thu May 19, 2022 2:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Gorsuch is on record wanting to overturn Chevron. Apparently his mother was the head of the EPA at the time of the ruling in question. What would Freud say about this?

Author:	B [ Sat May 21, 2022 11:04 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html

Author:	simple schoolboy [ Sat May 21, 2022 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
B wrote: Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?

Author:	B [ Sat May 21, 2022 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
simple schoolboy wrote: B wrote: Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico? Because if it came through the New York Post you don't get this:

Author:	4/5 [ Thu June 09, 2022 7:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Pour some out for the 4th Amendment.

Author:	Green Habit [ Wed June 15, 2022 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf

Author:	B [ Wed June 15, 2022 3:30 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Green Habit wrote: Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf will it be enough in the Brackeen case?

Author:	Green Habit [ Tue June 21, 2022 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Quote: Held: Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 8_dbfi.pdf

Author:	Green Habit [ Tue June 21, 2022 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.

Page 167 of 192	All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	4/5 [ Tue June 21, 2022 4:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?

Author:	simple schoolboy [ Tue June 21, 2022 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
Green Habit wrote: Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.

Author:	Green Habit [ Tue June 21, 2022 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
4/5 wrote: Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue? Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.

Author:	Green Habit [ Tue June 21, 2022 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Supreme Court
simple schoolboy wrote: Green Habit wrote: Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right. I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.