The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
I could see were if the media lays it on him real thick he would bow out
1) because there is at least some truth to this and 2) he was just a GWB errand-boy bitch and is weak
prove me wrong, space coyote
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am Posts: 35487
I am jacks total lack of surprise. Whose stupid idea was it to go get him references from women who he didn’t happen to rape or even know 30 years ago. Jesus
I don’t have this much faith, but I do think withdrawing the nomination would be the best possible next step for republicans. They scheduled a hearing, so they look like they were ready to investigate in good faith, but they don’t risk the PR nightmare that said hearing is sure to be (attack dogs like Cornyn are a disaster waiting to happen right now) and they still have a chance to get a nominee in.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
the optics of sitting in front of the camera and answering those questions.... the GOP should know - it doesn't matter what is said, he will look guilty ...
of course they only care if it negatively impacts them in the elections
so they will need to do their calculus
maybe it's time to brush off some other "elitist" shine boy and step him up to the plate
they must not of known this when they nominated him
there must be a dozen other stooges with good credentials that would do their bidding for them
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm Posts: 22547 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
"You know what's kind of incriminating? You're accused of assaulting a woman, and you just happen to have a list of 65 women that you did NOT assault."
_________________ Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
Off She Goes
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
Gone
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
She has. She doesn’t want public testimony without an FBI investigation, due to the committees’s desire to avoid calling others and essentially make it a “he said she said.”
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22392
McParadigm wrote:
96583UP wrote:
read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
She has. She doesn’t want public testimony without an FBI investigation, due to the committees’s desire to avoid calling others and essentially make it a “he said she said.”
can the FBI investigate? isn't there a statute of limitations on this stuff?
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19724 Location: Cumberland, RI
96583UP wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
96583UP wrote:
read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
She has. She doesn’t want public testimony without an FBI investigation, due to the committees’s desire to avoid calling others and essentially make it a “he said she said.”
can the FBI investigate? isn't there a statute of limitations on this stuff?
I believe they do background checks on potential nominees. So not a criminal investigation, but basically character interviews and such.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 80 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum