The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19724 Location: Cumberland, RI
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Lukin -> Not for You 3:1
Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.
How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.
Is Crazy Mary a cover?
I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.
I wonder what the bookmakers will say.
Other scenarios:
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no) Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no) Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Lukin -> Not for You 3:1
Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.
How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.
Is Crazy Mary a cover?
I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.
I wonder what the bookmakers will say.
Other scenarios:
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no) Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no) Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19724 Location: Cumberland, RI
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Lukin -> Not for You 3:1
Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.
How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.
Is Crazy Mary a cover?
I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.
I wonder what the bookmakers will say.
Other scenarios:
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no) Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no) Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
In that case, at 6.5 I'm taking the under.
Last four stadium shows have included this many cover songs: Wrigley 2 - 7 Wrigley 1 - 7 Boston 2 - 4 Boston 1 - 6
Remind me to make a book for these come the summer time.
This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?
This seems easy.
Failure to acknowledge and protect exactly that right - to refuse to engage in a particular behavior (in this case is situated in a commercial context), regardless of its (a)political or (a)religious motivation - amounts to compelling behavior. This seems like a dangerous precedent to set.
This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?
This seems easy.
Failure to acknowledge and protect exactly that right - to refuse to engage in a particular behavior (in this case is situated in a commercial context), regardless of its (a)political or (a)religious motivation - amounts to compelling behavior. This seems like a dangerous precedent to set.
We already compel behavior to eliminate (or pretend to eliminate) discrimination against protected classes. I don't think it's that easy.
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum