The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 ... 191  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2022 1:36 am 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Posts: 2811
Location: Connecticut
BurtReynolds wrote:
It's funny watching Bill Kristol suddenly turn against overturning Roe after decades of limp-dicked writing saying it should be overturned. What a shocking surprise!


I’ve also noticed this. He’s the anti-trump republican who gets too into the identity. JD Vance is going the opposite way.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2022 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39526
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
He's an actor paid to represent the Republican party (poorly) to liberals, and that was always his only job.

He's the reason why the term RINO was invented.

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2022 1:56 am 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39526
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2022 2:43 am 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
BurtReynolds wrote:
Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."


Many such cases.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
Not SCOTUS, but 5th circuit:



I hope the courts continue to dismantle the administrative state. Hopefully they do the ATF next.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2022 2:53 am 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
Gorsuch is on record wanting to overturn Chevron. Apparently his mother was the head of the EPA at the time of the ruling in question. What would Freud say about this?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2022 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar
Troglodyte
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 22378
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html

_________________
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2022 5:28 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
B wrote:
Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html


Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2022 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Troglodyte
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 22378
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
simple schoolboy wrote:
B wrote:
Ginni Thomas was totally the leaker.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/20/poli ... index.html


Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?


Because if it came through the New York Post you don't get this:


_________________
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Thu June 09, 2022 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
See you in another life, brother
 Profile

Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 6635
Pour some out for the 4th Amendment.

_________________
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle



Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Wed June 15, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Wed June 15, 2022 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Troglodyte
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 22378
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Green Habit wrote:
Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf


will it be enough in the Brackeen case?

_________________
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
Quote:
Held: Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 8_dbfi.pdf


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar
See you in another life, brother
 Profile

Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 6635
Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?

_________________
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle



Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
Green Habit wrote:
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.




Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
4/5 wrote:
Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?
Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.

Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
simple schoolboy wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.




Image
I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 7:45 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
Green Habit wrote:
4/5 wrote:
Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?
Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.

Image


The impetus for the original law was anti-catholic bias, so I don't know how this analysis holds up. Promoting religion over non-religion seems just dandy.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Tue June 21, 2022 7:46 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Posts: 5562
Green Habit wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.




Image
I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.


Several folks were talking about church of Satan schools. Good luck funding a school with like 5 students.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 ... 191  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Thu March 28, 2024 12:41 pm