The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 191  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sat September 22, 2018 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
tragabigzanda wrote:
Plowing right through is what these guys do best.
Republicans have to be aware that Democrats are going to be more eager to pack the court if they do plow it through.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sun September 23, 2018 2:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
I just read an article that made light of the fact that it wasn't until 1984 that states started changing the drinking age from 18 to 21. 1986 was the cutoff date.

the 2nd half of Bart O'Kavanaugh's senior year he was 18 and legally allowed to buy and consume

hence the treasurer of the keg club

attempted rape aside, should someone be shat on for buying kegs and drinking them when it was legal to do so?

the answer is clearly yes

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Sun September 23, 2018 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 39543
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

_________________
RM's resident disinformation expert.

“And truly, if life had no purpose, and I had to choose nonsense, this would be the most desirable nonsense for me as well."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Posts: 21745
You’ll see on my calendar here from when I was 17 that I did not attend an underage drinking party and also that I definitely did not go to see Titanic twice while it was in the theaters.

_________________
(patriotic choking noises)


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Posts: 5223
Location: A Dark Place
welp


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Posts: 3216
Who's on deck?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46410
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
Rapey McRaperson


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46410
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
So there's:

1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client

*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.

So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar
Site Admin
 Profile

Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 6932
BurtReynolds wrote:
Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46410
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
:lol:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
GOP either did not do their due diligence on this guy or they did and Trump really wanted him because he is mas puervo as well

Quote:
“I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” Ramirez said of the incident. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She told the New Yorker that she remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”


https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/brett-kavanaugh-second-sexual-misconduct-allegation-1202954080/

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
tragabigzanda wrote:
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)


wait - what's this one? link?

always cite your sources.

Spoiler: show
it's the backbone of the Pete T. internet research method

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:07 am 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Posts: 3216
It's in the New Yorker story.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
yeah i see it now

gross

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Posts: 5223
Location: A Dark Place
tragabigzanda wrote:
So there's:

1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client

*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.

So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?


We mustn't succumb to these accounts only because it is politically expedient, trag.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:18 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
the GOP are dumb af for nominating this guy

they should have just found some nerd

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:23 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22203
these women the GOP are attempting to delegitimize - these aren't porn stars or playmates or whatever

these are upper class / ivy league women

not the same impact as disparaging the Trump's entertainment industry tramps

these are the children of 'landed elites'. you can't just shit on these people and not experience backlash from the upper rings of society

they have a socio-economic network, credentials, degrees, etc

GOP stepped in shit bigtime with this one

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Posts: 21745
Well this is going well

_________________
(patriotic choking noises)


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 1:44 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 46410
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
run2death wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
So there's:

1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client

*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.

So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?


We mustn't succumb to these accounts only because it is politically expedient, trag.

I agree in theory, but the non-expedient route would be an investigation. Farrow notes that the statute isn't up, and Abramson gives a jillion characters more on how it could all play out, but the GOP will likely fight that route tooth and nail; they want this decided in the court of public opinion, with a wide enough margin of uncertainty that they can push their guy through in hopes that everyone will forget it all within just a few months. And if that's the game they want to play, then I say yeah, let's drag him through the mud until they can't wash the stink off...

Due process is absolutely the way I'd like to see this go, because there's absolutely a chance that these woman are lying. But in light of the GOP's likely denial of that due process, I'm forced to go with my gut, which tells me that Brett Kavanaugh is a scumbag.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: The Supreme Court
PostPosted: Mon September 24, 2018 2:11 am 
Offline
User avatar
Rank This Poster
 Profile

Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Posts: 5223
Location: A Dark Place
Yeah, I was kidding. It was a reference to a previous post.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3819 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 191  Next

Board index » Word on the Street » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri March 29, 2024 10:52 am