The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22293
Simple Torture wrote:
96583UP wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
96583UP wrote:
read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
She has. She doesn’t want public testimony without an FBI investigation, due to the committees’s desire to avoid calling others and essentially make it a “he said she said.”
can the FBI investigate? isn't there a statute of limitations on this stuff?
I believe they do background checks on potential nominees. So not a criminal investigation, but basically character interviews and such.
ok
so he's going to be nominated
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Yeah, the whole point of scheduling a hearing with no other witnesses or investigation was to make it upsetting enough to get her to back out. I have zero doubt that they are thrilled by this development.
who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm Posts: 32244 Location: Buenos Aires
--- wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22293
damn dude
too bad she won't testify
i wonder if even, all she'd need to do is show up and say nothing and the GOP loses
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47015 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
BurtReynolds wrote:
Let me know when we are allowed to talk about why they waited til the last minute to bring this up.
presumably because they thought all his shady court dealings would've been enough. when his puppeteering didn't make enough waves, then they said "eh, let's just #MeToo him instead."
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm Posts: 5223 Location: A Dark Place
--- wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47015 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
The Argonaut wrote:
Aziz has a joke about having to sit down and really think to yourself: "was i molested as a kid? Did I block it out?" Now, men have to sit down and really think: "Did I abuse a woman? Did I really not know any better? Did I really not give a shit?" The answer is yes, you probably did, you jerks
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22293
so what inalienable right will BK dismantle first?
13th amendment? Roe v Wade? $5 footlongs?
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
A reminder that intimidating Ford into silence, besides being a bad look going into the elections, also has the potential for long lasting repercussions as well.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47015 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
dimejinky99 wrote:
If a woman says she’s been raped ‘she asked for it’. If a guy gets accused of rape ‘it was just some youthful banter’.
Republicans are some fucked up people.
that's not really the narrative here any more; now it's more "this is a political calculation based on common youthful tomfoolery." it's the brock landers defense.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
