Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

AOC
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13195
Page 26 of 36

Author:  Jorge [ Sun October 13, 2019 4:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

96583UP wrote:
Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:
you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200

I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d


Spoiler: show
Image

Spoiler: show
Image

Author:  96583UP [ Sun October 13, 2019 4:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

theplatypus wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:
you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200

I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d


Spoiler: show
Image

Spoiler: show
Image

somewhere a DNC supercomputer that was crunching big data for weeks and just generated the same image to depict the projected ideal democratic candidate

Author:  BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 2:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

Impeach this bitch NOW

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ente ... 6MmxadRplw

Author:  epilogue [ Fri October 25, 2019 3:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

BurtReynolds wrote:

I truly believe that behind those sexy aviators your eyes spin in opposite directions.

Author:  Bammer [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

BurtReynolds wrote:

This can’t be real

Author:  McParadigm [ Fri October 25, 2019 11:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

Bammer wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:

This can’t be real

https://youtu.be/Dl-6N_bXdQ8
She seems super serious about it, and you should totally read it that way

Author:  BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

You don't joke about that.

Author:  Bi_3 [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

BurtReynolds wrote:
You don't joke about that.


Image

Author:  BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 8:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

Bi_3 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
You don't joke about that.


Image


:❤:

Author:  Bammer [ Sat October 26, 2019 3:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

McParadigm wrote:
Bammer wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:

This can’t be real

https://youtu.be/Dl-6N_bXdQ8
She seems super serious about it, and you should totally read it that way

Burt. I just watched this. Relax.

Author:  McParadigm [ Sat December 07, 2019 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC


Author:  Bi_3 [ Sat December 07, 2019 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

McParadigm wrote:




That is certainly one way to interpret those events.

Author:  verb_to_trust [ Sat December 07, 2019 6:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:




That is certainly one way to interpret those events.


Yeah man, Amazon is the best

Author:  Bammer [ Sat December 07, 2019 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

McParadigm wrote:

Caption this photo

Author:  McParadigm [ Sat December 07, 2019 7:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

Bammer wrote:
McParadigm wrote:

Caption this photo

When the judge actually listens to you and raises bail on your violent ex to $2.5m instead of $250k, so he doesn’t get out and kill you in a school parking lot.

Author:  4/5 [ Sat December 07, 2019 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

verb_to_trust wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:




That is certainly one way to interpret those events.


Yeah man, Amazon is the best

Amazon: Pretty good retailer, a driving force for efficiency and convenience gains enjoyed by consumers from a wide range of companies recently.

Corporate welfare subsidies: Bad.

AOC: Right that corporate welfare subsidies are bad and right to oppose $1.5 billion (or $3B depending on which article I'm reading) in handouts for Amazon.

Also AOC: Probably exaggerating that this is 'vindication' since it isn't as if they are headquartering there or creating anywhere near as many jobs as they would have previously.

Me: I kinda hope that AOC's messaging here wins even if I don't think it's completely justified because I'd like cities and states to stop giving away taxpayer dollars to lure huge corporations to their locale.

Author:  B [ Sat December 07, 2019 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

:thumbsup:

Author:  Bi_3 [ Sat December 07, 2019 9:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

She’s also not getting the all infrastructure and construction/support jobs. And the school. And the mass transit improvements. And the tax revenue from the other 23,500 jobs. Instead Amazon will put people into a shiny new space in midtown where they won’t need to ever go near or spend a dollar LIC.

Author:  bune [ Sat December 07, 2019 10:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

McParadigm wrote:
Bammer wrote:
McParadigm wrote:

Caption this photo

When the judge actually listens to you and raises bail on your violent ex to $2.5m instead of $250k, so he doesn’t get out and kill you in a school parking lot.

that guy died, McParadigm.

also turns out I know the judge in question...
4/5 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:




That is certainly one way to interpret those events.


Yeah man, Amazon is the best

Amazon: Pretty good retailer, a driving force for efficiency and convenience gains enjoyed by consumers from a wide range of companies recently.

Corporate welfare subsidies: Bad.

AOC: Right that corporate welfare subsidies are bad and right to oppose $1.5 billion (or $3B depending on which article I'm reading) in handouts for Amazon.

Also AOC: Probably exaggerating that this is 'vindication' since it isn't as if they are headquartering there or creating anywhere near as many jobs as they would have previously.

Me: I kinda hope that AOC's messaging here wins even if I don't think it's completely justified because I'd like cities and states to stop giving away taxpayer dollars to lure huge corporations to their locale.

fully onboard for that one.

Author:  96583UP [ Mon December 09, 2019 2:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AOC

i don't think municipalities should 'give' money to big corporations or to sports franchises to build stadiums.

but if a big corporation is choosing between locations and one municipality is willing to offer them a 'discount' on their tax rate so as to lure them to their town, i have no problem with that if there remain a significant net positive for the municipality (e.g. tens of thousands of jobs).

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/op-ed-governor-andrew-m-cuomo

Quote:
The New York Post, which is representative of extreme conservatives, says essentially that New York "gave Amazon $1 billion." Their argument is factually baseless. New York State and New York City gave Amazon nothing. Amazon, by our current tax structure, would generate approximately $1 billion per year in new revenue. Our proposal offered that, when and if those revenues are realized, the government would effectively reduce their $1 billion payment by about $100 million for a net to New York of approximately $900 million. New York doesn't give Amazon $100 million. Amazon gives New York $900 million. The revenue is from state and city taxes, including income taxes [in New York State and New York City: one of the highest rates in the country] with the second highest millionaire's tax in the country (only California is higher).

Page 26 of 36 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/